the stupid, it burns us
why on earth would *anyone* think that putting a tunnel for cars RIGHT NEXT TO THE WATERFRONT is a good idea?
Sure a new viaduct may suffer the same structural issues at some point in the future that the one we have now has. BUT NO ONE HAS BEEN KILLED BY IT IN AN EARTHQUAKE EITHER.
Does anyone *actually* believe that a tunnel would be SAFER than a new viaduct??
and how many times do we have to say "no really Nickels, this is just STUPID, build a new viaduct" before he stops trying to push this tunnel fantasy on the city?
talk about not being up for re-election.
*beats head*
(apologies to those not of this area)
Sure a new viaduct may suffer the same structural issues at some point in the future that the one we have now has. BUT NO ONE HAS BEEN KILLED BY IT IN AN EARTHQUAKE EITHER.
Does anyone *actually* believe that a tunnel would be SAFER than a new viaduct??
and how many times do we have to say "no really Nickels, this is just STUPID, build a new viaduct" before he stops trying to push this tunnel fantasy on the city?
talk about not being up for re-election.
*beats head*
(apologies to those not of this area)