Meta discussion on 'Acceptance' episode

Sep 14, 2005 08:55

Before reading this post, be warned that it definitely contains spoilers for last night’s ep., and may contain spoilers for future S2 eps. SO TURN BACK NOW IF YOU DON’T WANT TO BE SPOILED.

Still here? Ok, clickie for meta'ing )

Leave a comment

starhawk2005 September 14 2005, 17:38:52 UTC
I mean come on what the hell are they doing to Cameron?

Apparently, they're sabotaging her for the purposes of injecting drama into the show....blegh. Icks.

other than giving House something else to be right about.

And to make her look stupidly/wimpily obsessive. Icks x2.

MRI's of my back to count and if my leg even twitched they had to redo it

YES! I knew that was the case for head MRIs, wasn't sure about other body parts, so I'm glad for the confirmation.

The tattoo thing is a bit harder to say, I have several tattoos. Most of them are fairly large and I have never had any problems.

There's a show on the Discovery Channel called 'Mythbusters', and there was one show where they made a bunch of mixes of tattoo inks, many with far more iron in it than anything you'd ever see in an actual tattoo, and put them in an MRI machine...and saw nothing. And then they also tested the machine with an actual member of the cast who had tattoos. Maybe the medical establishment hasn't actually woken up to that fact, yet, even IRL. *shrug*

But yes, House is secks. Those eyes make me want to hand him my panties. Especially when the light falls on his face just right, and his eyes get all glowy... *thud*

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

starhawk2005 September 14 2005, 18:29:23 UTC
Thanks for clearing that up for me they always warn me before I go in, and it always freaked me out. I'm like oh dear God my angels are going to be ripped right off of my back or something LOL.

As far as I recall, they didn't see any effect. But this *is* a TV show, not a scientific paper or anything, so I suppose it's not as 'scientific' as it could be. But the proof is in the pudding, as they say - you've never had any ill effects.

And so many people have tats these days, if everyone who needed an MRI got their tats 'ripped' or burned off, I think there'd be a major public uproar.

I have no tats - I have issues with needles. And permanence. Heheh.

Those eyes make me want to hand him my panties

Actually, I want to change that. I want to hand him my panties....with me still in them. Take me to the supply closet and 'cure' me, Doctor House!!!! Sexual healing! w000t w000t!

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

starhawk2005 September 14 2005, 18:45:58 UTC
Sure thing! *starts handing out numbers and forming a queue*

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

starhawk2005 September 15 2005, 22:18:22 UTC
;)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up