S-seriousness? I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN HANDLE THAT

Feb 08, 2008 23:27

HERE IS THE DEAL: Baco made me take down my previous post about a conversation we had because the paraphrasing sounded kind of sexist and double-standardy. So in a future post, we will talk about sexism and double-standardness! But for now, you get the serious, non-conversation version of that post.

Baco and I were discussing a post rionaleonhart made about Ashes to Ashes, which is apparently the heterosexual version of Life on Mars. (Since, you know, I had no idea they were making a new show! And I still don't really know what it's about, since I, um, haven't finished watching Life on Mars yet. GETTING TO IT!)

I am really hoping that Sexy Alex and Gene do not have a romantic sexual relationship at any point in the show, because that is totally ...not cool. Unequal? Biased? I don't know what the word I want is, here. But the point is that as far as I know, there was no sexual relationship between Sam and Gene, and there totally could have been. Subtext? OH MY GOD YES.

I mean, there's even an interview in which the creator and writer of the show stated that there was intentional homoeroticism present. So I will be incredibly pissed if it is okay for Sexy Alex and Gene to sex it up, but not for Sam and Gene. Because that inequality is not okay.

life on mars

Previous post Next post
Up