(Untitled)

May 14, 2011 17:34

 
Read more... )

censorship

Leave a comment

Re: doll porn sprig5 May 15 2011, 14:46:31 UTC
I was going to ask you (not seriously) if I should try this one:




But it's a moot point now, because:



Reply

Re: doll porn sprig5 May 15 2011, 14:54:52 UTC
fb also removed any record of the number of ppl who commented when i uploaded those earlier images. i was not surprised by that though.

i must say one more thing, resto-- it's not "doll porn"; it's love!

Reply

Re: doll porn restoman May 15 2011, 15:22:48 UTC
Oh Dear! They certainly have made a mountain out of this molehill!

My guess is that no actual human at FB has seen the photo yet, that all of these actions have been taken automatically by the software.

I was being facetious in calling the photo 'porn' ~that is what the software at FB is thinking it is. However, with the black stars added over crucial areas, it makes it look like some cheesey ad for a porn site! lol

If LJ censors, it must only be for egregious violations. I belong to several LJ communities which feature gay soft-porn images.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up