#77

[spnanonhaven]

This post is for show discussion and fandom gossip only. NO ACTOR GOSSIP, NO ACTOR BASHING!!

RULES:
1. No posting f-locked content.
2. No linking between RL and online identities.
3. Keep the actor gossip to these posts or take it to spn_gossip.

Backup location:

Comments

final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

Adjusted up a tenth to .7

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/04/23/friday-final-tv-ratings-grimm-supernatural-adjusted-up-2020-adjusted-down/130315/

So for now .6 remains a HG fluke, though maybe The Avengers will bring a similar dip.

Re: final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

Okay, I don't understand this 0.7 - 0.6 rating. Does this mean the there were 700 thousandth people watching? I don't get US rating system.

Re: final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

No, it's a percentage of people aged 18-49 (advertisers care about that demographic because reasons, so total viewers count a lot less than demo) who were watching that show, based on Nielsen estimates from their sampling.

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/02/27/numbers-101-whats-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating/

This explains it fairly straightforwardly.

Re: final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

ayrt

°___° Now I get it, well kind of. Thanks for the info nonnie.

Re: final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

This is going to be so interesting!

I think it can shine more light on the Castiel and ratings debate.

Re: final ratings for 7.19

[anonymous]

The Castiel and ratings debate exists in a black hole of unreason in which the laws of physics forbid light to be shed.

Really, I think the only useful conclusions the data allows are that Spn is still very safe for renewal as far as the CW is concerned, and the CW itself is still nosediving spectacularly in general.