Leave a comment

spankmypirate October 21 2012, 17:11:43 UTC
God, it's bitingly realistic for now. It's actually really disturbing how much of the social commentary and critique of the patriarchy hold up today.

IKR! That's why I think Hardy was ahead of his time in so many ways. It's sad how much controversy his novels received, to the extent that he gave up writing altogether. He was a genius. And it is disturbing when you think of how little has changed. It's incredible impressive that for a man writing in the 19th century he was able to critique the patriarchy so harshly 0 and accurately - as he did.

There's this whole conversation she has with Angel very early in their courtship where she is struggling with why the sun shines on the "just and the unjust alike" and he is actually taken aback that someone he took for a simple country girl is capable of philosophical thought.

Oooh, I had forgotten about this part! I guess what I meant to say is that Tess doesn't have any HUGELY ambitious outside goals that transcend the area Wessex? Like, all she wants to be is happy, and to have as normal an existence as possible, despite all her problems. I think one of the most touching aspects about Hardy's framing of Tess is that he writes about this lower class, country girl as if she were a great lady, a queen, almost a goddess - just as if she really were a real life D'Urberville. Like, just because she's not rich or upper class doesn't mean she's not an important person with problems that don't matter - because she is and they certainly do. I mean, you have all these great stories in literature about rich, privileged, upper class women, which, while not taking away from how interesting or great their stories or characters are, they don't affect me in the same way that Tess's does, because she's such realistic character with great strength, despite how 'small' her world is compared to theirs.

I did a quick search on goodreads (lol) and I think this quote kind of sums up both what you and I are trying to say:

“Many...have learned that the magnitude of lives is not as to their external displacements, but as to their subjective experiences. The impressionable peasant leads a larger, fuller, more dramatic life than the pachydermatous king.”

Reply

ms_mmelissa October 21 2012, 17:23:26 UTC
I guess what I meant to say is that Tess doesn't have any HUGELY ambitious outside goals that transcend the area Wessex? Like, all she wants to be is happy, and to have as normal an existence as possible, despite all her problems.

Yes, that's certainly true. And all the terrible things that happen to Tess are because her father finds out that they used to be nobility and then gets all these ideas into his head. When really she's happiest when she's working on the farm milking the cows. Those victorians and their pastoral themes!

(which reminds me of being in the Musée d'Orsay and seeing this picture of a bull and my sister was like "...Why is there a picture of a bull on the wall?" and I was like "Oh it was a reaction against industrialism and the victorians started worshiping nature and that's reflected in art." Which I guess proves my English degree is useful sometimes? Sort of?)

Reply

spankmypirate October 21 2012, 17:50:38 UTC
lol! I am considering writing my long essay or thesis about the pastoral and eco-feminist themes in Hardy, so... Musee d'Orsay better watch out, is all I'm saying :P

Reply


Leave a comment

Up