Небось, все эти страны - неподписанты какого-нибудь важного международного закона или human rights конвенции.
"One commonality among all these countries, including the United States, is that they have a relatively high Human Development Index (HDI) ranking. The HDI is a composite statistic developed by the United Nations that measures key dimensions of human development, including life expectancy, education, and income per capita. While the HDI rankings of these countries may not be identical, they are all considered to have a relatively high level of human development."
Пушнул GPT немножко harder и он выдал вот это:
"Yes, there is a notable international treaty that has not been ratified by these countries: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The UNCLOS is an international treaty that establishes a comprehensive legal framework to govern the rights and responsibilities of nations concerning the use and conservation of the world's oceans. It was adopted in 1982 and has been ratified by the majority of countries worldwide.
The United States has not ratified the UNCLOS, despite signing it in 1994. The U.S. has not ratified the treaty due to concerns over its potential impact on national sovereignty and military operations. However, the U.S. generally abides by its provisions as a matter of customary international law.
Several of the small nations on the list, such as Andorra, Liechtenstein, San Marino, and Vatican City, have not ratified the UNCLOS, possibly due to their landlocked status or minimal maritime interests. Other countries on the list, like Barbados, Liberia, Micronesia, Monaco, and Tuvalu, have not ratified the treaty for various reasons, which may include siding with the U.S. or other concerns specific to their national interests.
It's important to note that the reasons for not ratifying the UNCLOS may vary for each country, and this commonality does not imply a coordinated stance among these countries."
Нет, ожидаемый ответ использует более известные понятия, нежели какое-то там соглашение, и полнота списка, по крайней мере, если верить источнику, предполагается, в отличие от кучи других landlocked countries, которые тоже не подписывали это соглашение.
"One commonality among all these countries, including the United States, is that they have a relatively high Human Development Index (HDI) ranking. The HDI is a composite statistic developed by the United Nations that measures key dimensions of human development, including life expectancy, education, and income per capita. While the HDI rankings of these countries may not be identical, they are all considered to have a relatively high level of human development."
Пушнул GPT немножко harder и он выдал вот это:
"Yes, there is a notable international treaty that has not been ratified by these countries: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The UNCLOS is an international treaty that establishes a comprehensive legal framework to govern the rights and responsibilities of nations concerning the use and conservation of the world's oceans. It was adopted in 1982 and has been ratified by the majority of countries worldwide.
The United States has not ratified the UNCLOS, despite signing it in 1994. The U.S. has not ratified the treaty due to concerns over its potential impact on national sovereignty and military operations. However, the U.S. generally abides by its provisions as a matter of customary international law.
Several of the small nations on the list, such as Andorra, Liechtenstein, San Marino, and Vatican City, have not ratified the UNCLOS, possibly due to their landlocked status or minimal maritime interests. Other countries on the list, like Barbados, Liberia, Micronesia, Monaco, and Tuvalu, have not ratified the treaty for various reasons, which may include siding with the U.S. or other concerns specific to their national interests.
It's important to note that the reasons for not ratifying the UNCLOS may vary for each country, and this commonality does not imply a coordinated stance among these countries."
Reply
Нет, ожидаемый ответ использует более известные понятия, нежели какое-то там соглашение, и полнота списка, по крайней мере, если верить источнику, предполагается, в отличие от кучи других landlocked countries, которые тоже не подписывали это соглашение.
Reply
Ответ: это страны без flag air carrier.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment