What bothers me most about fertility treatments is the hypocrisy of those most gung-ho about them. In general, the same folks who are willing to overlook suggestions that "IVF or surrogate or whatever" and fertility drugs and such might be less than natural tend to oppose legal/social or technological advances that could benefit people with LGBT issues. Everybody's supposed to be fucking thrilled for them because they're pregnant by IVF for the sixth time but a same sex couple wanting to get married is unnatural. Or we're supposed to be happy medical science (often abbreviated "God") has relieved their burden and pain of childlessness, but a man or woman suffering from GID is doing something unnatural by seeking a medical solution
( ... )
Reply
I'm definitely not a singing pig.
IVF is not necessarily covered by insurance, but it's certainly more likely to be than SRS.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment