Leave a comment

quiet_dignitea September 23 2010, 18:31:00 UTC
What bothers me most about fertility treatments is the hypocrisy of those most gung-ho about them. In general, the same folks who are willing to overlook suggestions that "IVF or surrogate or whatever" and fertility drugs and such might be less than natural tend to oppose legal/social or technological advances that could benefit people with LGBT issues. Everybody's supposed to be fucking thrilled for them because they're pregnant by IVF for the sixth time but a same sex couple wanting to get married is unnatural. Or we're supposed to be happy medical science (often abbreviated "God") has relieved their burden and pain of childlessness, but a man or woman suffering from GID is doing something unnatural by seeking a medical solution ( ... )

Reply

sosoclever September 23 2010, 19:20:45 UTC
I less than three you.

I'm definitely not a singing pig.

IVF is not necessarily covered by insurance, but it's certainly more likely to be than SRS.

Reply

quiet_dignitea September 23 2010, 19:40:55 UTC
-999,999,997!

Reply

tnjade September 23 2010, 19:57:49 UTC
"This" times a billion less than 3? Is that what that means?

Reply

quiet_dignitea September 23 2010, 20:30:08 UTC
Just a billion less than three! That's a LOT <3 by just about any standard!

Reply

sosoclever September 23 2010, 21:44:51 UTC
You'll have to excuse quiet_dignitea. Well, maybe you don't have to. But she's a bit on the silly side sometimes.

Reply

quiet_dignitea September 23 2010, 21:50:41 UTC
Must be the company I keep!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up