FIC: Pink and Fuzzy (Neal/Archie, NC-17)

Oct 22, 2009 22:26

Title: Pink and Fuzzy
Author: sophie_448
Rating: NC-17
Pairing: Neal/Archie
Word Count: 1198
Warnings: graphic m/m sex, light bondage
Summary: Pretty much porn, top!Archie
Notes: unbeta'd, and experiment to see if this could actually be done.

Neal certainly wasn’t going to mention that he maybe possibly had a slight submissive streak )

fanfic, ai, rps, neal/archie

Leave a comment

thebiggest_lie October 23 2009, 03:16:22 UTC
Okay, this is definitely incredible hot, and well written and wonderful...and wow. I loved it!!!

That being said, (and trust me, loved it here) I still can't 100% see Archie as a top. Weird, I know, but I am stuck in my ways.

Still, I LOVE you for writing this. You need to write more in this fandom! You're fantastic. <3

Can I friend you, btw, so I never miss fic? I have issues keeping up with comm's...even my own, LOL.

Reply

sophie_448 October 23 2009, 03:26:09 UTC
LOL no I really totally know what you mean. I mean, even with this it clearly isn't a regular thing for him. That's actually why I used the cuffs? Because I needed something concrete to change the power dynamic. Archie is really very bottomy. I just like ... have this reaction to whenever people start saying X is TOTALLY a top or Y is TOTALLY a bottom b/c I have THOUGHTS~ about topping and bottoming and stereotypes about sexual roles and um STUFF. And okay, you don't really need my whole ESSAY on the subject. The point is, I always feel compelled to write the opposite just to prove it can be done. Cause I'm contrary or something.

I'm really glad you liked it! And thank you! You are too kind.

But actually, I kind of hate having friends, so ...

GOD, OF COURSE YOU CAN! ♥ ♥ ♥

Reply

thebiggest_lie October 23 2009, 03:35:02 UTC
Actually, I would love to hear all of your thoughts on this. I am a big fan of meta ( ... )

Reply

sophie_448 October 23 2009, 03:48:11 UTC
OMG NO, don't be sorry ( ... )

Reply

thebiggest_lie October 23 2009, 04:00:19 UTC
Yes, I do think you are correct on fandom in general. I came from bandom before this, and that was probably the most well informed fandom I have ever set foot in. There was a lot of flexibility in almost every single pairing, and I adored that about it.

Speaking as a bi-sexual (leaning towards women) woman, who in my teen years had more gay friends than straight (by a large ratio...I spent every friday night at a teen gay club) I feel like I may have a bit of a better understanding than the general person in fandom, so I guess I try to give leeway to other writers? I don't know if I am making sense, I am rather tired, lol.

I think there should always be a stride to realistically portray people as people, even in the most AU of AU's. In the end, we are basing them off of people, and it should show. My point being that, this has every right to be an issue for you ficwise.

I think I will stop now though, because I am fairly certain my thoughts are not coming out coherently, haha. :D

Reply

sophie_448 October 23 2009, 04:07:41 UTC
IDK if I give leeway to people? I think it depends on how much I like other aspects of the fic, concept, writing style, etc. if I'm willing to let stuff slide a little bit. But I'm all about don't like don't read. If something bothers me, I'll just back button to a corner of the internet I like better.

*SEKRIT BISEXUAL HANDSHAKE TIME* by which I mean, hey me too!

ANYWAYS! you should get some rest or something! Been fun essaying with you :-D

Reply

sburet84 January 30 2010, 03:31:41 UTC
I know I'm totally late to the party here, lol, but you must write this Cookmann fic! I can totally see where you're going with this, and I bet it would be great.

*samantha*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up