This is gonna cause conflict

[sonofthunder]

K here's my take on Abortion and Cloning from a religious aspect which you might not have heard. First Dr. Alfred Blaylock and Dr. Vivian Thomas. Two wonderful doctors who literally saved hundreds of millions of lives and someone in your families life has been saved cause of what these two did. They found a cure for shock and they were the first

Comments

[insulinash]

Look up the word human...no where does it say that to be a human means to have (or be) a soul. That is your religious view on being a human. You believe that to be the truth therefore leading you to believe the rest of what you've said. This post seems to try and convince us (the readers) that abortion is wrong. Your reasoning; you are killing a human...and the fetus is a human because it has a soul. Well...if it were that easy then there wouldn't be so much controversy over this subject in the first place. If it were fact that everyone has a soul then things would be a bit different. Also, you are saying that you think God has the power to not give certain fetus' a soul (if it would danger the mother, etc.), you also said that you think that the child that Dr. Blaylock saved should have been saved because it was by God's will. Well if God has the abillity to control all that then why don't you think he has the ability to stop people from aborting children? To take away that technology. Or to not have given the technology to

[sonofthunder]

#1 A definition of a human. If you do not accept the fact that a soul is a requirment to be human that is perfectly fine. Thus you must go off pure science to determine a human being. In that case, people with down syndrome are not human thus have no more rights than animals do. The difference between an Ape and a human is 1 chromosone the difference between a human and a human with down syndrome is 1 chromosone. Thus by your logic Humans with down syndrome have no rights. of if you accept the fact that they do have rights then you must accept the fact that animals have rights and zoos are a form of slavery and everytime you go to the zoo you are endorsing slavery. Thus if you have gone to a zoo and endorsed slavery then your are illogical cause your arguement is not constient. God denies us abortion? hmmm well why did he allow guns to be made or murder to happen in the first place. But let's say I take away your free will then why even have you exist? And if you were to take away your children's free will then why have free will?

[insulinash]

The definition of human: A member of the genus Homo and especially of the species H. sapiens

[sonofthunder]

Which chromosone is different means nothing in this arguement because the basis of the arguement from the scientific standpoint is on the percetange difference between human and apes it is not which which chromose is different it's simple the percentage difference which is 1% caused by the chromoseal difference