(no subject)
i don't know who Michael Wolff is, but he's giving me the impression he's kinda dumb. or at the very least, pedantic and obtuse. at minimum, he would have made a far more compelling argument if he'd chosen a wide representation of books, rather than the two books most likely to ping the partisan knee-jerk reaction.
most awesome comment ever? "if you were any denser, you would achieve critical mass."
lolz.
most awesome comment ever? "if you were any denser, you would achieve critical mass."
lolz.