Controversy.

[social_aversion]

Comments

[astroteen]

In fact, homosexuality wasn't even the issue at hand; it was a metaphor. It's the reason I won't apologize, strictly because, well... no one bothered to read to into it.

it wasn't a good metaphor if you were the only one who recognized what it was at first. and even someone studying analytical thinking might not have been able to figure it out.

[astroteen]

ps: you could have atleast picked a hot model

and another thing, you're not allowed having porn on your journal unless it's friends only; it says in the tos
you should fix it before it's reported and your journal is suspended

o.o

[self_revolution]

uhh excuse me since when are umm boobies porn?

Re: o.o

[social_aversion]

That was sort of what I was thinking as well. Perhaps the words in the phone number are considered pornographic in nature.

Re: o.o

[astroteen]

nudity, etc
don't get all specific on me because i don't care
it says in the tos
and i didn't write the tos.

Re: o.o

[social_aversion]

What are 'tos'?

Re: o.o

[ximsometalx]

it doesnt really matter. her imagination makes her say crazy things.

Re: o.o

[tedhead]

Terms of Service

[enraged_locust]

I agree with the model part

[czamero]

i understood and i'm only in the high school!

[social_aversion]

It's because you're a faggot.

*laughs* Just kidding.

[social_aversion]

Of course not... but they don't have to. It's my journal.