Leave a comment

Comments 4

janradder February 24 2009, 15:38:51 UTC
God, I hated this book, thoroughly. She's got the whole MS thing that you don't find out about until, what -- a hundred pages into it -- even though it's supposedly what's fueling her passion to form a band? And then she just kind of drops it only to bring it out and mention it in passing from time to time, but she never describes how the MS affects her life except to say that it does. Then there's the structure of the book, how it keeps jumping back into her past for no apparent reason (I mean, really, why does she keep going back to her childhood at those odd moments when the memory she's describing has nothing to do with what comes before or after -- they're just odd non-sequiturs). Some of the writing was fairly hackneyed, too -- that part with her "marrying" the stage made me want to crawl under a table out of embarrassment for her. I also got pretty sick of listening to her complain about how her band never got any breaks -- they were a mediocre band that had a couple of okay songs and, by her own admission, they seemed ( ... )

Reply

snurri February 24 2009, 18:44:02 UTC
First off, not sure if you've seen Laurie's response to you, below.

I agree that there were some odd jumps that didn't always flow for me, and it did get fairly negative towards the end, but I felt like that reflected her state of mind at the time she was writing about. As for the rest I'm OK to agree to disagree--except that I think it's unwarranted to suggest that she got a book contract because of who she's married to.

Reply


anonymous February 24 2009, 18:28:27 UTC
No book ever gets published for just one reason, surely you know that. I didn't begin with "the MS thing" because I didn't want it to be a disease book; I wanted the reader to be in the life I was living first. And, of course, it's not for everyone. It's tough to have an artistic identity when living with an artistic genius, but I'll keep slogging along! Cheers!

Reply

janradder February 24 2009, 20:55:03 UTC
I'm not sure if you'll be checking back for responses but I had to say that I'm sorry for the "Mrs. Paul Westerberg" comment. It was obnoxious and, as you pointed out, not true.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up