Pr0nz

Jun 08, 2013 03:28

Been just watching a stylish BDSM couples porno which is of some decent quality and better than some other pornos. Even the toppy guy is good-looking with some strikingly gorgeous eyes, even though he's a bit too muscular for me and reminds me of Stephen Campbell Moore somehow (not that that's a bad thing). And also, fuck yes, the girl is totally shaved because I always feel landing strips are some concession to the whole "shaved bits are for paedos" bullshit and and she has rather beautiful bits and also her boobs are not perfect, so that is good as well. I have only skimmed through it so far and watched the anal scene about one hour in (well, I couldn't resist anal) and it sort of looks okay. Although I still don't understand what a supposedly couples-friendly and woman-friendly porno that takes ages to show the woman's expressions and shit still has against showing actual fucking lubricant being applied. C'mon, they show it all the time even in really cheapo and crap gay porn, why not make it a part of the eroticism of the scene? (Sorry, film, in that you lose to mainstream blokey fare like Big Wet Asses...)

But yeah, it seems okay as far as non-dungeony BDSM porn is concerned, and to be honest, considering how long we've had to wait for *that*, it's better than nothing. It does get points for stylishness so far. I look forward to watching the rest of it--these gifs alerted me to it first, and they look *really* promising.

Although is it sad that to get a real, proper toppy man/shivering woman in an elegant scenario fix, I still had to go and look at this for a couple of minutes? Wait, no, it's that fucking movie and I've never seen a single male actor wield sexual power the way this guy does in this movie; I am totally not sad. It's still a bazillion times more erotic than any porno I've seen and he's the posh toppy guy I eventually came to after I retreated for a wank. *wistful sigh*

pr0n, fap fap fap, unf unf unf

Previous post Next post
Up