sex without a relationship or a relationship without sex... which lasts longer?

Sep 12, 2004 23:54

i heard a really good quote from sex and the city today and i forgot it already and i'm too lazy to rewind it... but it essentially had the notion that our girlfriends should be our soul mates and a boyfriend should be just a lucky guy who you have fun with.

but taking on that mentality... isn't that unfair for the guy? what if he wants a soulmate and all you're willing to give him is the title of "lucky guy"?

granted... i guess in order for my theory to work... there has to be guys out there that aren't afraid of commitment and who aren't scared of thinking about the future. i have yet to meet one guy that is really ready to say that they are willing to commit that much. my best friends, my aquaintances, the random guys on the street...
what is wrong with saying that you love someone so much that it hurts and that you aren't afraid of getting hurt and that you're willing to say so... out load.

haha... but are guys even afraid of getting hurt? what is with their commitment problem?

lol... who freakin cares. my weekend was pretty decent considering that i was on duty. it was really productive and i got to hang out with jon and elisa and michelle and anthony.

which reminds me, if any of you are eating.... nm. that's just too disturbing to think about.
Previous post Next post
Up