Leave a comment

paperkingdoms October 26 2008, 03:00:27 UTC
I had seen this recipe. It's interesting to know that the result is edible. I still remain... cautious.

Reply

smarriveurr October 26 2008, 03:05:12 UTC
Edible is a good term. The result is not exactly "cake" - as one would expect, y'know, with the lack of leavening. Still, I'm hoping that experimentation will produce increasingly cake-like results.

For ten-minute-microwave-chocolate-cake, though, I maintain it ain't too shabby.

Reply

paperkingdoms October 26 2008, 03:14:45 UTC
As someone who bakes at the drop of a hat, though, I'm having a hard time picturing the sort of situation that would result in me making 10-minute-microwave-chocolate-cake rather than, say, something really good.

Reply

smarriveurr October 26 2008, 04:58:46 UTC
Well, I really think this isn't so much intended for those who bake at the drop of any garment.

On the other hand, if I store chocolate baked goods in the apartment, I will eat disproportionate amounts of said baked goods. A pan of brownies is not safe on my day off. For me, something that takes minimal work and produces exactly enough to share with ragnvaeig is a Very Good Idea.

Reply

paperkingdoms October 26 2008, 05:34:11 UTC
::nods:: That's fair.

Is it a significant improvement over a handful of chocolate chips in the first place?

Reply

smarriveurr October 26 2008, 17:14:25 UTC
In that I would consume an equal volume of chocolate chips left to my own devices, yes.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up