(Untitled)

Jul 31, 2009 21:00

...Britannien, I am...in some ways quite pleased with this development.

But I must insist that you keep your drunken shenanigans to a minimum at odd hours so as to not disturb the locals.

And also that you wear pants at all times.

--AND ALSO THAT YOU DO NOT STEAL MY SIGN AGAIN!

Leave a comment

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 01:20:27 UTC
And if that sign lacks steel reinforcement who is to blame if someone walks off with it? These things require diligence, old bean. Diligence.

Reply

paristocracite August 1 2009, 01:31:21 UTC
Diligence, ja.

And frequently a loaded gun.

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 01:41:58 UTC
...

well

Who are we to lecture the finer points of trousers anyway?

Reply

paristocracite August 1 2009, 01:43:49 UTC
TROUSERS ARE A FINE INVENTION.

AND MEANT TO BE UTILIZED.

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 01:46:39 UTC
THIS FROM A NATION WHO MANAGES SOMEHOW TO MISPLACE THEM THE SECOND PRUSSIA OR WHOEVER THE HELL ELSE SLAPS AN ACT OF ACCESSION ON THEIR DOOR?

Reply

geschmacksache August 1 2009, 01:53:28 UTC
Must we bring my brother into this?

Must we?

Reply

paristocracite August 1 2009, 02:03:43 UTC
Nein. We must use some reason here.

Reply

paristocracite August 1 2009, 01:54:39 UTC
That was--

That.

A simple misunderstanding, you see.

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 01:57:54 UTC
There's quite a bit of historical evidence!

Reply

paristocracite August 1 2009, 02:02:09 UTC
...for you, as well.

Reply

allons_enfants August 1 2009, 02:03:39 UTC
Ouais, ouais, to this I can much attest!

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 02:04:27 UTC
YOU STAY OUT OF THIS.

Reply

allons_enfants August 1 2009, 02:06:21 UTC
Ah, Angleterre, 'ow can I, when the chance to see you made a mockery by one of your own of is as alluring as ever?

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 02:17:46 UTC
It is common knowledge that all things lewd and unfathomable hhave their root on YOUR side of the channel.

Reply

godsaveourqueen August 1 2009, 02:18:10 UTC
I can hardly be held accountable for the instances in question!

Reply

allons_enfants August 1 2009, 02:25:09 UTC
My side of the channel, is it? Denial is a pitiful sing, Angelterre!

I sink it would be a more efficient task if we should count the times zere are not any of zese, 'ow you say, "instances in question."

Reply


Leave a comment

Up