Crime and Punishment

Mar 07, 2012 17:44

I read a lot of blogs about religion and a lot of blogs about women's issues, as well as several that cover a combination of the two. I've read several posts recently about the problem of hell, i.e., infinite punishment for finite sin, and I suddenly had the thought that there might be some connection between that and the way conservative ( Read more... )

thoughts, kids, sex, politics, feminism, religion

Leave a comment

superl99 March 8 2012, 08:54:30 UTC
I've always wondered what they see as the consequences for the man, because it takes 2 to tango! Oh wait, the little slut probably seduced him like Eve, so it's not his fault. :P

Reply

skjaere March 8 2012, 09:13:30 UTC
Theoretically, he's supposed to marry her and stick around for the rest of his natural life, but he is not required to carry a pregnancy or give birth. (Can you imagine what contraceptive and abortion legislation would look like in this country if men could get pregnant?)

Also, some churches (including my favourite, MHC) are now turning things around and saying that the man is more at fault for non-marital sex, because women are weak-willed creatures, and men should know better. We just can't win, can we?

Reply

superl99 March 8 2012, 10:31:59 UTC
So we're either evil temptresses or helpless damsels with no will of our own. It couldn't possibly be because sexual activity is natural, instinctual and bloody good fun for both sexes.

Reply

skjaere March 8 2012, 10:35:52 UTC
Only after he puts a ring on it. Then, anything goes.

Reply

wavestar March 8 2012, 22:38:26 UTC
No it doesn't. Us married ladies don't deserve birth control, either.

Reply

skjaere March 9 2012, 01:54:21 UTC
Okay, anything goes sexually, so long as you have a baby after.

Reply

superl99 March 9 2012, 09:46:30 UTC
I think that's what the other holes are for.

Reply

brighty18 March 13 2012, 08:16:33 UTC
Can you imagine what contraceptive and abortion legislation would look like in this country if men could get pregnant?
Actually, I'd very much like to see that. Historically, it's always been the woman who bears the consequences of sex simply because of (the obvious) issue of pregnancy. That's never been fair, has it?

Also, some churches (including my favourite, MHC) are now turning things around and saying that the man is more at fault for non-marital sex, because women are weak-willed creatures, and men should know better. We just can't win, can we? Grrrrr... that pisses me off on so many levels, it's not even funny.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up