from today's postsecret:
i know for a fact that nathan did NOT send in this postcard, because if he came to me and said he wanted to wear a dress at our wedding, i'd be whisking him to a bridal store before you could say "vera wang." i've been trying to get that man to cross-dress for over eight years! the fact that he won't means he doesn't really love me, y/n? should i demand he wear a wedding dress because it's my day and i want to i want him to look like a princess?
speaking of nathan, i'm going to be leaving him behind yet again when i go to new york. it just makes sense for me to go by myself, at least for now, because it is far easier for me to find a place for myself than for us to try to find a place for the two of us and our four cats. i'm willing to live with roommates, but i'm not willing to live with roommates with nathan. we're way too naked for that.
i'm not as apprehensive this time around. i mean, we've done this before. we're old pros at long distance relationships. and this is only two years. and he might move up there with me the second year, anyway.
but still. it's going to take some getting used to, not having him around. only talking to him on the phone. i never thought i'd be living without him again after i finished undergrad. here's something sad: i'm going to be in new york for our ten-year anniversary! we might not even be together to celebrate!
as tragic as that all is, nathan's been remarkably awesome and supportive throughout this entire thing. frankly, i think he's excited that he gets to make trips to NYC again. he's just in it for the toy tokyo and curry soup.