A Nerd Fallacy

Jan 07, 2010 20:55

I threw out a little theory on Fandom!Secrets that had to do with something I've been thinking about lately...I hesitate to say it because it’s a simple answer for a complicated thing done by many different people, but I still wonder if there's not a strain of this in fandom. ( So I'll toss it out. )

meta, fandom, bats, competency porn

Leave a comment

jlh January 8 2010, 04:56:31 UTC
Obsessiveness and also social awkwardness or misanthropy generally. I think that's what actually separates Kirk and Spock, that Kirk is incredibly good at all social niceties. (The implication is that Bones can be but does not always choose to be.) Spock is the outsider, the one who isn't always sure about the unspoken in social situations. Kirk has an incredible social instinct, not just for picking up the ladies but for diplomacy in general. (Picard does too, of course, but he's not represented as a genius, but more a very good, experienced captain who can do all this shit blindfolded.) That's why Spock isn't captain yet.

But what grew out of K/S was this simplification into the cowboy/nerd shipping like McShep. And of course, Sheppard is quite smart, I think he has an MS or something and went to the Air Force Academy but don't quote me on that. Anyway, Sheppard is more like Watson, in that he is very intelligent but just isn't a genius like Holmes/McKay. And when you identify with the misanthropic genius, it isn't just that Watson and Sheppard aren't geniuses, but that they waste the brain power they do have with understanding social situations; real geniuses have no time for this! When of course if you look at at least the Holmes canon, Holmes is glad that Watson does notice these things and is there to grease the wheels.

So how can Kirk be a genius if he's also very good in social situations and also gets into bar fights and drinks a lot and sleeps with a lot of ladies? That can't possibly be wish fulfillment! So he must not be that much of a genius.

That said, I think the OP of the secret was reading stuff I'm not reading. McCoy is not a genius, but an awesome doctor, so Kirk can be a genius in K/Mc. nuTrek K/S may be different.

Reply

sistermagpie January 8 2010, 14:53:56 UTC
I definitely think the social aspect is sometimes the most damning. And just that whole...what you totally describe here. First that there's a resentment of people putting their minds towards social situations at all, caring about those sorts of things. It's hard not to relate that to the many metas I've read about people who definitely want to be seen as the person who can't do that, who just doesn't have that ability (even though it's really not being presented as an ability but the sign of a weaker character), or claims that fandom social groups are based around completely different things that reject all of that. Which is why it's sometimes funny to read the many things about the first part, where people talk about BNFs in fandom being those cool kids because it's like some people need that story in their lives no matter what. Like it's more about their defining themselves as being shut out by this vague concept of "cool" than whatever is really going on. Heh. Like there was that one person who did a whole history of the BNF clique and I remember it reading like it was written by some sort of alien who didn't believe people could ever become friends without it being part of some master plan.

Or also Archie and Nero Wolfe where Archie is totally the Watson character, and he doesn't share Nero's particular genius (or the crippling rigidity that goes with them) but you'd be a fool to think of Archie as dumb just because he makes that part of his persona as much as Nero makes his quirks part of his. Archie's facility with language and his ability to understand people is a form of high intelligence in himself.

I definitely think McCoy has an advantage there being a doctor, though. Doctor is a specific skill that people can appreciate while keeping within its limits.

Reply

Here via metafandom. baka_kit January 11 2010, 10:19:00 UTC
First that there's a resentment of people putting their minds towards social situations at all, caring about those sorts of things. It's hard not to relate that to the many metas I've read about people who definitely want to be seen as the person who can't do that, who just doesn't have that ability (even though it's really not being presented as an ability but the sign of a weaker character)

I'm trying -- and failing -- to figure this one out. Maybe because I don't see it as some magical ability that some people are granted and others aren't, but as a specific set of skills, which to some extent can be picked up by most people?

I was one of those poorly socialized fen. Ridiculously awkward and had a had time with social cues. But I made a conscious decision to learn to emulate proper social behavior. I'm still shy, especially around groups of new people, but I can handle myself.

Obviously, some people are born with a natural talent for socializing, just like for singing or gymnastics or whatever. And maybe all of my hard work will never get to the level that some people can achieve effortlessly. But my experience at picking up the skill of social interaction (like learning to sing) has given me new ways to express myself. In the end, the hard work was worth it. And as a bonus, I find myself a lot less resentful of the people who have that particular talent.

I'm rambling a bit, I know. Migraine meds are starting to kick in.

Reply

Re: Here via metafandom. sistermagpie January 11 2010, 15:54:02 UTC
I'm trying -- and failing -- to figure this one out. Maybe because I don't see it as some magical ability that some people are granted and others aren't, but as a specific set of skills, which to some extent can be picked up by most people?

That is a really good point. In a way sometimes intelligence gets seen the same way, where people want to make it a magical ability that appears in only certain ways. When really social ability is a combination of different things and is definitely something you can learn. Even people who would be considered good at it sometimes stumble if they're in a different social setting where they don't know the rules or the signals are different. But sometimes the people who want to define themselves as incapable of that sort of thing are really saying that they want to be the person who doesn't do it.

Reply

jacquez January 9 2010, 04:59:23 UTC
Anyway, Sheppard is more like Watson, in that he is very intelligent but just isn't a genius like Holmes/McKay.

(trucking in from metafandom)

Actually, what drives me COMPLETELY BALLISTIC about Sheppard & McKay is that both canon and fangirls (hee) keep telling me that McKay is smarter _when it is perfectly evident to me that Sheppard is smarter_. (Look, I don't want to insult any Mensa members, but -- there's a joke, right, about how Mensa is full of people who are smart enough to join Mensa, but not smart enough NOT to join Mensa. I'm just pointing out here which of them joined Mensa, and which of them was smart enough to join but didn't.)

You're right about the social aspect thing, completely -- I think so completely that even in cases where the socially competent character is actually smarter than the awkward nerdy character, people just don't notice or believe it. (Available evidence from Star Trek, for instance, tells me that Kirk is not just extremely smart, but that he might be smarter than Spock; certainly he does not evince any difficulty keeping up with Spock intellectually, um...ever, that I can think of.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up