Comments | sirenspull: [text // 23]

neargenius in sirenspull

[text // 23]

Feb 23, 2011 09:28

I have been here for over a year now ( Read more... )

c: asano rin, c: the joker, c: finnian, c: sam merlotte, !: near, c: miles edgeworth, †: yagami raito, c: yoshiya kiryu

Comments 359

[voice] mentis_reae February 23 2011, 15:51:20 UTC

Of course it should not.

[text] neargenius February 23 2011, 16:02:00 UTC

It shouldn't, for everyone?

[voice 4eva] mentis_reae February 23 2011, 16:06:06 UTC

Of course not. Proper evidence cannot be gathered here; even what evidence there is could easily be manufactured. Due process cannot be pursued for crimes from home.

text in yo face neargenius February 23 2011, 16:09:54 UTC

And what about confessions?

Thread 64

(The comment has been removed)

text neargenius February 23 2011, 16:24:32 UTC

Why do they deserve that?

(The comment has been removed)

neargenius February 23 2011, 16:55:17 UTC

So everyone is given the same chance, regardless of confessions.

Thread 22

[audio] deservesabone February 23 2011, 16:23:57 UTC

No.

text forever, old friend neargenius February 23 2011, 16:26:53 UTC

It's such an easy answer as that?

deservesabone February 23 2011, 17:18:13 UTC

You can't punish someone for what they've done outside of here. ...People can change. This place gives 'em a chance to.

neargenius February 23 2011, 17:23:43 UTC

You can't say that for certain.

Thread 15

[Text, neat script] soul_scatter February 23 2011, 16:35:56 UTC

Those from home cannot be tried under the laws of this land as they lack not only the proper tools for restraining them, but the proper knowledge of what they did.

However, those of us who are indeed familiar with it need to work within the local laws and be vigilant so that when those from home inevitably recreate their crimes they can be brought to the justice allowable here.

[text forever!] neargenius February 23 2011, 16:55:49 UTC

So we should watch them.

Same! soul_scatter February 23 2011, 16:58:01 UTC

We would be remiss in our duties and fools if we did not.

neargenius February 23 2011, 17:12:24 UTC

Is it truly an inevitability? Isn't that a bias toward their guilt?

Thread 21

text; tiersdes February 23 2011, 16:43:35 UTC

What is relevant here is relevant here. What is relevant back home is relevant back home.

That applies not just to crime, but any type of event that would affect the rest of one's community, or even society as a whole.

...And as for your little spiel about criminals, I don't suppose you think too highly of vigilantes or rebels, now do you?

text forever neargenius February 23 2011, 16:57:10 UTC

Who is it that defines relevancy? Who would define the parameters for such significant events as you mention?

But I don't really care about vigilantes or rebels.

all text, all the time, how you like me now tiersdes February 23 2011, 17:05:38 UTC

Relevancy is defined by a multitude of factors, but typically by those in power. After all, those in power are the ones who make the rules to begin with---but it's the people they rule over who break them and enact change.

[Although that's kind of rich coming from an nigh-immortal Empress who's been ruling for 800 years, but, uh. Details, details...]

But are they not breaking the rules? Do they not act outside of the law? Clearly you have an interest in crime. Are they, too, not criminals themselves?

YEAH, WELL, SAME, LADY, SAME HERE. neargenius February 23 2011, 17:15:05 UTC

Who is in power, here? It would be important to define that first, I think. There are rules, but there are multiple powers and multiple thoughts in play.

And I will repeat what I wrote before: I don't care. I like it when criminals are caught. I want to catch mine. That's what is important.

Thread 15