[video]

Nov 26, 2010 08:31

[Alois is pink-nosed and pink-cheeked, and hasn't changed entirely out of his going-out-when-it's-so-cold clothes, yet. His gloves are off, and his muffler is draped over his shoulders rather than wrapped around his neck, but he's got a hat and coat on, still. And he's next to a large vase of white roses, atop - well, it's a desk, but a few might ( Read more... )

c: franz d'epinay, c: grell sutcliff, c: oz vessalius, !: alois trancy, c: ciel phantomhive, c: raphael

Leave a comment

gaveherwings November 26 2010, 16:55:43 UTC
Are you asking whether anonymous tokens of affection are generally considered acceptable, or appreciated personally?

How long can things like that, (your...decorations?) How long do they keep, if they're actually living, fresh cut plants? All the decorations they're putting up in public places are silk and plastic- that's partially because of certain smells being irritants, I assume, and allergies.

Reply

masterbaiting November 26 2010, 16:57:48 UTC
I guess I'm asking personally. What do you think of it rather than what does everyone.

-I don't know, I'm not the one who does it.

Reply

[Voice] Also carefully filtering from certain parties now, namely all castmates gaveherwings November 26 2010, 17:27:14 UTC
What do I think of secret admirers.

I think...[There's a slow, thoughtful consideration] if you want my honest opinion, Alois-

I think that people who are overly concerned with an outlet for their own spontaneous feelings put far to much sentimental stock in one-time gifts, tokens like anonymous flowers. I think that's a shallow secret admiration, born of the impulsive romantic feelings instead of...carefully and truly caring for a person. Wait and see if they notice? With flowers, it's almost artless, that's not even trying to be subtle. That's wanting to be seen, and figured out, and almost rather selfish.

[And hypocritical, because there were white camellias from Siren's Flowers on Re-l's desk earlier last month. But of course she'd known straight away who'd sent them.]If it's a surprising gesture that brings the one you admire a brush with joy, then...yes, I'd think it's well worth it. But sometimes knowing that someone cares for you, and being unable to return that affection, can only heap more anxiety upon them. Especially if ( ... )

Reply

[Voice] filtered, then! masterbaiting November 26 2010, 17:30:02 UTC
...So it's dumb, right?!

[derp.]

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 17:33:44 UTC
Sending flowers? It's impulsive, not insincere, but...

Some tend to have very little self-discipline over their passions.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 17:34:55 UTC
Passion's not about self-discipline.

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 17:41:37 UTC
Untrue. Passion is a powerful virtue of the human condition, but utterly wasted without careful dedication and purpose.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 17:43:29 UTC
Passion is meant to be a large swell. It heightens things - if it's restrained, it's not so passionate anymore.

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 17:52:01 UTC
Yes, and if it heightens things past the point of sturdy equilibrium, then what?

Then you're stuck sweeping up the pieces.

It's better to hold the ones you care for above the needs of your own passions. That is among the highest compliments you can pay a person.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 17:57:09 UTC
Definitely not.

Besides, at least if you're sweeping those pieces, they've become yours to pick up.

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 18:12:56 UTC
That's...a tempting, but very dangerous attitude.

When you truly love someone, you want them to become completely true to their self-actualization as possible. To grow, from the first signs of those things you first found admirable. Then, the fullness of their existence is a treasure for the world, but one you know you've discovered first. Regardless if they'll ever be yours.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 18:30:14 UTC
You can't just build someone up for someone else to come along and take.

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 18:36:07 UTC
[A pained, restrained pause. Too much sudden pressure, behind the eyes.]

It's...that- that doesn't have to be your personal reason.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 18:37:44 UTC
No, but it's the outcome, isn't it? You work hard to make someone lively, and then someone else basks in it. And you're left exactly where you started before - backwards, even, because you know what it could be like.

Reply

[Voice] gaveherwings November 26 2010, 19:00:22 UTC
It is satisfaction in their being, not your right to having claim to any of it, which is important.

Personal pride aside- love is not about having what you want.

[A sobering statement, and now this has slid far further into uncomfortable territory than he's willing to re-examine, for now. So he's going to collect himself and return to the safety zone of flowers.]

Which is why, when sending anonymous flowers, people delude themselves into thinking they are asking for nothing in return, when in fact they hope to be found out, or hear of a pleased reaction, or to be recognized through the gift, although that token may only be received as an unwelcome disruption.

Reply

[Voice] masterbaiting November 26 2010, 19:26:39 UTC
So what's the point of giving gifts?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up