Jul 26, 2005 13:33
I've been spending a lot of time at this year's Fringe theatre festival
and thought I might as well post reviews I've written of some of the
shows I've seen:
Call me Kirk: The Star Trek Adventure
"I'm no starship captain..." remarks Michael Schaldemose at the end of
this lively one-man show. "...but you can call me Kirk." Shaldemose's
over-the-top impersonation of Captain Kirk is excellent, and his
transitions between Kirk and every other well-known charater - and some
not so well-known - make for a fast-paced and generally engaging show.
There are only two real downsides to this show: A strong familiarity
with classic Star Trek is a prerequisite for following the jokes, and
those who are familiar with it basically already know what the show is
going to be: one guy impersonating every Star Trek character and poking
fun at all of show's quirks and cliches.
Girl's Guide
Working as a dominatrix is not necessarily empowering, not often
glamorous and not always sexy, discovers Eleanor O'Brien, star of
Girl's Guide. It is, however, usually hilarious.
It's not entirely clear if this material is truly based on her real
life experiences, but if the truth truly is stranger than fiction, I'll
have to assume Girl's Guide is totally fact-based. A one-woman show,
Girl's Guide starts off as a monologue, but quickly - and seamlessly -
changes gears as O'Brien switches seamlessly from one bizarre character
to another.
The only real caveat with this show is just how frank it is. There's
enough dirty talk to make the cast of Sex and the City nod in approval,
and even a little nudity thrown in for good measure. But the mixture of
sex, humour and heart made this show one of the high points of my
Fringe experience.
S.M.I.L.E. While You D.I.E.
Call center humour in Winnipeg? That's like shooting fish in a barrel,
I mused, before seeing SMILE while you DIE. I honestly didn't see how
this premise *couldn't* work, or be anything other than hilarious.
And work it does. And hilarious it is.
Rachelle Fordyce is a deliciously naive, heart-breakingly sweet
customer service representative who really just wants to enjoy working
at a job where she gets to help people. Until, of course, the heartless
mechanisms of working for a big corporation threaten to crush her
spirit.
Fordyce wrote and stars in the play, but it's not a one-woman show in
the truest sense. Instead, the play is a combination of her performance
and various audio and video clips. This combination is effective at
both keeping the play interesting to watch, and conveying the often
impersonal nature of its theme.
"Write what you know" and "it's funny because it's true" are two
popular axioms in comedy, and SMILE While You DIE is the epitome of
both. The theatre appeared to be a near sell-out on the night I
attended. To say that Fordyce has struck a chord with the "faceless
cogs" toiling in the call center-dominated workplaces of our city would
be a rather large understatement.
Exiting the theatre, my call center-experienced companion remarked,
"that was practically a documentary." Sure, he was joking. But like
Fordyce's message in SMILE while you DIE, it was the element of truth
that made it hilarious.
An Unfortunate Woman
Haunting beauty, amazing versatility, intriguingly subtle narrative and
understated humour made this show one of the most memorable that I've
seen at this year's Fringe. The range of facial expressions Nicola Gunn
shows off in this one-woman show is enough to make Jim Carrey envious,
and when it was over, I could hardly believe I had only been watching
one performer for the entire 60 minutes.
"I don't like happy stories," remarks Gunn on her website, and despite
the frequent laughter emanating from the audience, the show does have a
distinctly melancholy mood. An Unfortunate Woman is actually the tale
of several tragic characters whose lives have apparently intertwined in
some not-so-obvious ways. The only real downside to this show is it
requires a lot of attention to Nicola's mannerism's to follow the
story. And if you're the sort of person who gets depressed watching Mr.
Bean, you may want to skip this show. On the other hand, if you're in
the mood for a truly unforgettable performance that defies description,
missing An Unfortunate Woman would be...unfortunate.
Teaching Witchcraft
In this unusual one-man show, Keir Cutler is a 15th century
doctor/priest/scientist/inquisitor determined to expose the conspiracy
of witchcraft that lies all around us. Cutler's delivery is his
strongest suit, remaining absolutely straight-faced throughout his
lecture, pointing out how to identify witches, the dangers of
witchcraft, and driving home the importance of his work.
Cutler is also capable of improvising during the play; for example, my
friend's coughing was pointed out and made into part of the act. We
were left wondering what would have happened had we named someone as a
witch, as Cutler often urged us to do.
The material is a bit long-winded, and the jokes are a bit too few and
too far between, but the funny stuff truly is funny, and Cutler's
distinctive and unusual stage presence certainly makes it a worthwhile
show.
The Doctor's Duty
The Doctor's Duty is one of the lesser-known plays from well-known
Italian playwright Luigi Pirandello. Despite being first performed in
1913, the play's central theme is a timeless one: the difficulty a
doctor faces in deciding between what is truly the right thing to do,
and the obligations of his profession.
This play is very well cast, and the performances are of high quality.
Meghan McNicol plays central character Anna Corsi, forced to deal with
both her husband's near-fatal injury and her disapproving mother.
I admit to being a fan of McNicol, but her work here is certainly
comparable to her best efforts in other plays. Robert MCorrister as
Tommaso Corsi did not come across as quite grave enough, given his
unusual situation, but his performance is still quite strong overall.
The show is only really lacking in two areas: length, and overall
"Fringe-ness". This is a traditional drama, and as such is a bit out of
place amongst the quirky one-person shows and oddball comedies that
seem to dominate the Fringe. And at only 30 minutes, it's tempting to
just skip it in favour of some of the longer shows. Nevertheless if
you've a desire to take in one of the few truly fine dramas at the
Fringe, do your duty and attend this one.
Over Coffee
Over Coffee is a straightfoward "relationship drama" that suffers from
a weak script and some average performances from its cast. Todd Cooney
and Katherine Supleve play Jeff, a 32-year old lawyer, and Katy, the
young college student/waitress he's having an affair with. Mat Gilroy
plays Derek, Katy's best friend since childhood and Michelle Karasinski
plays Laura, Jeff's wife. It's a young cast, and Over Coffee feels like
the work of a very young playwright (Lisa Nelson both wrote and
directed the play). This is largely its undoing.
Gilroy and Supleve appear to be playing themselves (i.e. young
university students), and they aren't necessarily bad at that. Cooney
as the married lawyer has the most difficult role to pull off, and he
can't quite manage it. The dialogue is weak to begin with, but the
casual, abrupt delivery of most of it certainly doesn't help it to
resonate either. Supposedly Katy and Jeff are a pair who have an
obvious and immediate connection between them. That's a reasonable
premise, except for the fact that Cooney and Supleve have absolutely
zero chemistry to work with. These two really do not look like they
could be a couple at all, especially not a couple born out of a passion
so intense that Jeff doesn't think twice about cheating on his wife.
The script offers up a few laughs as well, most of which are
intentional, but also some that could not possibly have been, given the
context in which they appear. The play feels as if it's moving
inexorably towards an obvious conclusion, and when it does arrive, it
doesn't offer any surprises or insights into the characters or the
whole business of cheating. Jeff in particular offers little
explanation for his actions: "Hey, I'm a jerk, too bad" basically sums
him up. Few people in real life - even lawyers - would hardly be so
one-dimensional. Affairs are serious business, both for the married,
and unmarried people involved. Over Coffee's treatment of this subject
is much too loose and casual for it to really be believable. Playwright
Nelson needs to develop a stronger ear for dialogue, and a stronger
grasp of character motivations for this to work on any kind of dramatic
level. Over Coffee will appeal mainly to a late teens/early twenties
audience, and they might enjoy it. Older Fringers should probably pass.