This entry deals with a story that has been the subject of some discussion within bandslash fandom. Some of that discussion and certain comment exchanges could certainly be described as wanky. I am responding to the story, which makes this a personal response, but it is less a proscriptive response (you should warn for x, you need to warn in y
(
Read more... )
Comments 138
i might check it out.... my eyebrow is raised in interest
and let it be known that i'm a little in lust with your meta (or at least what i classify as meta)
Reply
Eyebrow raise! I see yours and raise you one.
And thank you. I like thinking this stuff out; it's awesome that you're willing to come along for the ride.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Which is to say of course you're invited, and I'm really impressed you found this, read it, and came up with a thoughtful response before I even got around to dropping a comment in your LJ about the post. ZOOM.
Unfortunately, I'm kind of sluggish, so I'm going to wait until tomorrow to respond to your comment. Thank you for it, though.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And while a warning isn't censorship, I think it can create a certain type of anticipation, expectation, or avoidance that might keep away the very people most capable of appreciating--or critiquing--the writing's value and relevance.
I think that's a valid point. It's interesting, and I know I might be criticized for trivializing the issue, but I was most annoyed by the formatting of the warning - if it's something that might be offensive, I separate it out from the header.
Also, I don't even know if it's possible to eliminate triggers. Very, very true. I have issues with open floorplans - like in Ikea by the food court - and parking lots. My ex had issues with sidewalk curbs. At the same time, we are establishing that there are certain things which can reasonably be expected to be triggering, and that people have been assuming a social contract to warn for ( ... )
Reply
b) I think it is up to what a community might or might not accept ... and I tend to believe that you don't have to label everything in slash or erotica, though an 'nc' might be helpful in places not accustomed to surprises.
c) My views are from someone who doesn't generally write slash in which I give a shit about the characters, or have OTP feelings of any kind. Which makes my perspective pretty different, and I think, more given to queer male impulses and rationales.
d) Thoroughly interesting post.
Reply
b) I think we've established some really interesting community boundaries. In a place like Nifty, this stuff wouldn't have been labeled at all, as you are probably very aware, and that's part of the reading experience. But on LJ, we aren't as cautious or prepared.
c) Tentacles?
more given to queer male impulses and rationales.
Really interesting point. If you feel like clarifying, I think I know what you mean -- in fact, I'm pretty sure I do -- but I'd be interested to hear more specific stuff.
d) Thank you! A bit exhausting, but it was a lot of mental fun for me.
Reply
c) Touchy, trusty tentacles! Good for what ales 'ya!
More base queer male impulses and rationales. Ie, I don't really gravitate towards that "relationship" category on nifty. Get me off, dammit! And while I appreciate an author who treats rape or violence in a manner that actually develops the story in an interesting way, that's really not why I'm there. NC appeals to me if well-written.
(Nothing appeals to me if I see typos. I once corrected someone's bad fic for grammar and typos and e-mailed it back to him/her.)
Reply
Leave a comment