A thought about pornography

Mar 26, 2009 19:24

Okay, so we have pornographer for the person who makes porn, but pornography means both the whole, um, field as well as particular items of porn.

Why don't we say pornograph to mean a single item/instance of pornography? You know, like an epigraph being the object of study in epigraphy. You could say, "I purchased a very fine pornograph recently; would you like to see it?" or similar.

Come on! It would be fun! You know it would!

(I also have a tendency to use "pr0n" as the root morpheme for these things, and I have found myself saying "pr0nography" before. Anyway.)

weird things, linguistics: morphology, questions

Previous post Next post
Up