Mar 26, 2009 19:24
Okay, so we have pornographer for the person who makes porn, but pornography means both the whole, um, field as well as particular items of porn.
Why don't we say pornograph to mean a single item/instance of pornography? You know, like an epigraph being the object of study in epigraphy. You could say, "I purchased a very fine pornograph recently; would you like to see it?" or similar.
Come on! It would be fun! You know it would!
(I also have a tendency to use "pr0n" as the root morpheme for these things, and I have found myself saying "pr0nography" before. Anyway.)
weird things,
linguistics: morphology,
questions