that may be so. but only in your perspective. It's the girls freakin livejournal, let her talk about how she thinks people get consumed with rituals over real importance in the faith. it's a fucking good topic. I mean, why can't she do it without your cowarding assonying remarks? Why do you feel the need to do this mr. anonymous? In all honesty? do you want to feel better than others? because if that's the case, i suggest you should do something about it, instead of being a complete loser. i mean, its obvious you need some sort of gratification. why? did you not get it from your parents growing up? that's not christina's fault. and shit, when you look at christianity, there is right and wrong. so you can bend anyone to be a "judgemental christian" solely based on the fact that there is accountability for the actions you take. How bout you leave a well thought out remark?
Re: (it wasn't me, i promise)
anonymous
March 22 2007, 05:30:43 UTC
that may be so. but only in your perspective.
ok, so the "but" was in response to my comment. maybe a "so" would work. but a "but" is contradictory, and if it is in response to my comment then what is it contradicting? I'll elaborate because you clearly misinterpreted. If you didn't reread it then i'll get into it. I'll highlight the major points. -that may be so. but only in your perspective. -and shit, when you look at christianity, there is right and wrong. so you can bend anyone to be a "judgemental christian" solely based on the fact that there is accountability for the actions you take. Because there is a right and wrong in christianity, it is inherently judgemental. All christian's are "judgemental" christians.
and unless you are mister or misses anonymous, there was no thought in the intent. it was an attack. or why else would they hide? i mean, you really can't defend the point of view of a non-existant person.
Re: (it wasn't me, i promise)silencesingsMarch 21 2007, 20:00:02 UTC
yeah, you're right. it is judgemental. i guess i can't really hold myself up on some higher judgemental pedestal cause that would be pretty ridiculous.
Brad, I love you. When I saw this comment last night, I really wanted to respond but was too tired to put up a fight. You said it better than I would've anyway.
Reply
It's the girls freakin livejournal, let her talk about how she thinks people get consumed with rituals over real importance in the faith. it's a fucking good topic. I mean, why can't she do it without your cowarding assonying remarks? Why do you feel the need to do this mr. anonymous? In all honesty?
do you want to feel better than others? because if that's the case, i suggest you should do something about it, instead of being a complete loser. i mean, its obvious you need some sort of gratification. why? did you not get it from your parents growing up? that's not christina's fault. and shit, when you look at christianity, there is right and wrong. so you can bend anyone to be a "judgemental christian" solely based on the fact that there is accountability for the actions you take. How bout you leave a well thought out remark?
Reply
Reply
andand yes, any comment can be judgemental. actually id argue that every comment would be judgemental. but really, that wasnt anonymous's comment.
Reply
Reply
Reply
ok, so the "but" was in response to my comment. maybe a "so" would work. but a "but" is contradictory, and if it is in response to my comment then what is it contradicting?
I'll elaborate because you clearly misinterpreted. If you didn't reread it then i'll get into it. I'll highlight the major points.
-that may be so. but only in your perspective.
-and shit, when you look at christianity, there is right and wrong. so you can bend anyone to be a "judgemental christian" solely based on the fact that there is accountability for the actions you take.
Because there is a right and wrong in christianity, it is inherently judgemental. All christian's are "judgemental" christians.
and unless you are mister or misses anonymous, there was no thought in the intent. it was an attack. or why else would they hide? i mean, you really can't defend the point of view of a non-existant person.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment