I Did Not Need To See That

Jun 17, 2009 16:23

Let me first off state that I am typically fine with depictions of violence.  However, something today got me thinking- how fine?  What are my limits?

I can look at what the cat drags in without wincing, although the blood of someone I know tends to make me feel rather ill.  But that's real life.  I'm pretty aware of my status on violence in real life: I avoid it whenever possible.  I don't write it, because I suck at it.  I don't mind reading it, though I certainly don't seek it out.  Movies are another story, but action movies make me wince for all kinds of reasons.  Gore's just one of them.

And in comics?  I actually feel that not shying away from violence can in many cases add to the story.  It can indicate defeat, weakness, victory, defiance- when used well, gore can actually be a well done part of the story.

However?  I do not need to see a closeup of the face of a character I really, really like, giving a full color view of his expression while being shot point blank in the head.  Particularly when this is a flashback among flashbacks and serves pretty much NO PURPOSE.

Kthnxbai.

comics, philosophy

Previous post Next post
Up