I heard a British victim of the Mumbai attacks on the radio this morning talking about how how he was not given any financial compensation. He comes across a lot better
in this article than he did on the radio (in my opinion) but, while I agree that there seems to have been a slightly horrifying lack of co-ordination, particularly when it came to
(
Read more... )
is a bit bizarre. As is
"I didn't expect any special treatment. But we were in a terrorist attack! No one came and said: 'Don't worry, your Dad's on the way.'"
Clearly he did expect special treatment.
Mostly the feeling I get from this article is it is a completely misplaced appeal. Surely the point is conditions for injured/disabled people in Britain is far less than ideal, surely we should have a system in place to ensure such people has all they need, rather than waah, fix my special case right now.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I assume that it could cost quite a lot to renovate his house to make it suitable but, surely, nowhere near 2-5 million? He was pretty unclear on the radio about what he needed that sum for and his campaign website is no clearer.
Reply
And there are already UK funds for this:
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_10018715
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_10018723
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Caringforsomeone/DG_10018921
Reply
Hmm, I think this is why his complaints that the government are not paying him attention is grating so - they did pay attention, they set up all these funds and bodies for him to apply to. Surely that is much better than a phonecall saying "we are so sorry"
Reply
The impression that I had from the interview was that it was all about the money, the articles all make him sound less mercenary but more whiny.
Reply
Leave a comment