This is a wonderful idea, I have enjoyed reading it very much, thank you. Who knows - it may be even true, although it would imply conserving the instinct for 65 million years while going through many stages of evolutionary change. This requires a stretch of imagination, while the other part - the mammals doing the cleaning of the big guys before the birds have appeared - sounds quite convincing. Somebody got to do the job.
I remember clearly how I first became fascinated with the dinosaurs as a child. This was not related to any movie, just books. I have not felt any particular sympathy to them (at least, less than to the mammals). It was the feeling of alternative that fascinated me. This was a very different version of our world, the one populated with dinosaurs. I have somehow never felt the world of mastodons and saber-toothed tigers as foreign in this way. I had a similar impression of alternative from "the birds" by Daphne du Maurier (more from the book, less from the movie by Hitchcock).
When I was a kid, the idea was that large dinosaurs were spending a lot of time in water (where the cleaning job could've conceivably been done by the fish). Then the consensus have changed towards land dwelling, but nobody explained who and how cleaned these animals.
My first reaction (after I've finished laughing and clapping my hands) was to doubt that the dinosaurs carried as much skin parasites as mammals. You have yourself described how our furry soft skin is inferior to the reptiles' skin, and the birds are usually shown picking from crocodile teeth rather than their skin. But Google says there are worms on crocodiles and ticks on snakes.
This image of Uintatherium is a particularly unflattering artist's impression - it seems that it was just kind of a rhino - basically a cow. I have no trouble extending my anthropomorphic fantasy to such animals. Most mammals are like some deformed humans, with changes in color and size, but a similar "functioning". I think the whole horror of Kafka's Metamorphosis was in selecting the insect for the role - would Gregor have transformed into a dog, say, or a lemur, the effect would have been comical. I think this is not due to a "genetic memory" but to our ability to "understand" mammals (or think we do) because we recognize our own features in them.
The scales are no hindrance; the reptiles have all kinds of ectoparasites: mites, ticks, maggots, bot flies, etc. (And you are right about the crocodiles, they do have nematodes). Galapagos finches clean Galapagos turtles from their leeches and mockingbirds clean large iguanas from ticks, etc.
There is even a theory that blood-sucking insects have finished the dinos through spreading infections. It is quite a book. There was an explosion of such parasites in the Cretcious. The idea is that the big size of the dinos and the supposed absence of the cleaners resulted in chronic infestations that gradually undermined the large ones.
отличная идея! хорошо помню детский иррациональный интерес к динозаврам, который прошёл через какое-то время Не иначе, как коллективное бессознательное)
Comments 7
I remember clearly how I first became fascinated with the dinosaurs as a child. This was not related to any movie, just books. I have not felt any particular sympathy to them (at least, less than to the mammals). It was the feeling of alternative that fascinated me. This was a very different version of our world, the one populated with dinosaurs. I have somehow never felt the world of mastodons and saber-toothed tigers as foreign in this way. I had a similar impression of alternative from "the birds" by Daphne du Maurier (more from the book, less from the movie by Hitchcock).
Reply
This Uintatherium, isn't he a cutie?
( ... )
Reply
This image of Uintatherium is a particularly unflattering artist's impression - it seems that it was just kind of a rhino - basically a cow. I have no trouble extending my anthropomorphic fantasy to such animals. Most mammals are like some deformed humans, with changes in color and size, but a similar "functioning". I think the whole horror of Kafka's Metamorphosis was in selecting the insect for the role - would Gregor have transformed into a dog, say, or a lemur, the effect would have been comical. I think this is not due to a "genetic memory" but to our ability to "understand" mammals (or think we do) because we recognize our own features in them.
Reply
There is even a theory that blood-sucking insects have finished the dinos through spreading infections. It is quite a book. There was an explosion of such parasites in the Cretcious. The idea is that the big size of the dinos and the supposed absence of the cleaners resulted in chronic infestations that gradually undermined the large ones.
Reply
Не иначе, как коллективное бессознательное)
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment