I found a couple of essays on Mary Sue's that I skimmed. They're very long, so I didn't read everything in them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Suehttp://www.merrycoz.org/papers/MARYSUE.HTM What I wondered about is this; if an author places themselves into a novel, but is careful to use character traits good and bad which apply to them, will the
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
I've certainly noticed a lot of OC's taking over various fanfics, I usually switch off and move onto something else. That can also happen when the fic is largely about a minor character (or major even) which I have no interest in.
Haggis for example, inserted himself in look only and through a very good Hitchcock way.
Was he the hotel guy in Victoria's Secret where he started cleaning the camera?
A Ranma link?!
I have no idea what that is.
Reply
Would it though? There are people who can be very objective about their good and bad qualities.
I also think you can put parts of yourself in your fic/character. Whether it be experiences or knowledge.
I think that's what I meant. Not to actually put everything about yourself into it, but to put parts, so that you could use things you've experienced so that you know what you're talking about. I think I just explained it badly in my post.
Reply
But I don't think authors can be objective about themselves.
However the very act of putting yourself in a story can come off Sueish, even unintentionally.
I think.
Reply
But surely a Mary Sue is only as good as the person who writes them. If a person is very negative about themselves in RL surely that would reflect in the character and he/she would become more real because of it?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment