Face to Face: an analysis of Michael Jackson's face through the years, version 2.0. Part 2

Jun 14, 2011 15:52

Last year, I did an analysis of Michael Jackson’s face to give my opinion on the ‘countless plastic surgeries’ Michael ‘had’ over the years. Some of my information was a bit off and I had some organization problems with the images. Now, a year later, I’m reposting it with better information, better organization, and many more pictures for all to ( Read more... )

history, dangerous, thriller, pictures, invincible, epic post, bad, captain eo

Leave a comment

cervrok June 15 2011, 16:53:36 UTC
i'm sorry, but i don't see it. history era looks like a natural progression from dangerous and even bad. but when 2000, 2001 rolls around, something very noticeable has changed. the space between his nose and mouth (what is that called?) gets much wider and the shape of his mouth changes. in the yrmw video and the 30th anniversary concert, he looks like he can barely move his mouth.

his overall facial structure remains the same, for sure, but i don't see how you can go from the botdf video to the yrmw video and say he looks the same.

Reply

carpetstains June 16 2011, 21:20:08 UTC
^ THIS.

I always thought I was the only one who felt this way. Glad to know I'm not. Makes me feel like I'm not the horrible person some people have called me for thinking that way.

I would also like to add that around 2000/2001, his nose became very upturned. This is most obvious during the CD signing at the NYC Virgin Megastore signing.

EDIT: See what I mean in the Invincible era pic posted where it's MJ's profile and he's holding a picture from the Bad tour.

Then during the This is It era, the upturned nose was no longer. I personally think he looked GREAT during This is It.

But he always looked great.

Reply

dirtydianano June 18 2011, 08:44:50 UTC
"I always thought I was the only one who felt this way. Glad to know I'm not. Makes me feel like I'm not the horrible person some people have called me for thinking that way."

Word. It would really irk me when I couldn't express my opinion that he had more surgeries than some overly protective fans claim or what Mike said himself, without my logic or "loyalty" being attacked.

- let me get a little OT & tl;dr -
It's pretty obvious that more procedures had been done, than what he let on. He didn't have to give us a list, anyway. I just don't get why some fans get so angry with an innocent disagreement. It's not as if we're passing judgement. It's simply an observation. He could do whatever the fck he well pleased with his face. He was fine as hell and will always be to me. I don't have to know why he did what he did with his face or understand it or approve of it because it was, well, HIS FACE. That would be bullshit.

But, back to the subject, I'm glad that this is a place where we can calmly disagree/agree on such things.

Reply

februarymoon942 June 18 2011, 13:13:01 UTC
I'm glad that this is a place where we can calmly disagree/agree on such things.

I had to echo this. Indeed, it's relieving.

Reply

carpetstains June 20 2011, 13:59:14 UTC
Girl, you are my hero.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up