album discussion: bad

Jul 23, 2009 14:12

oh, hell yes. HERE WE GO, HERE WE MOTHERFUCKING GO.

why do my lj cuts never have that 'adult concepts' warning thing? ): )

bad, epic post, album discussion

Leave a comment

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:29:46 UTC
I'm going to sum up my thought with a GIF. Real words cannot describe how much I love Bad, and I do hate when that happens.


Reply

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:33:02 UTC
This GIF also applies. I definitely don't believe in using actual sentences right now. I apologize for my actions. You are asking for words; I'm giving you GIFs to describe my love ... I guess, haha.


Reply

daybreak25 July 23 2009, 19:33:57 UTC
gurl, gifs are just as good! and you can't unf to words, so.

BY THE WAY, IS THAT A NAKED LILY ALLEN WRAPPED IN A BRITISH FLAG IN YOUR FIRST ICON? ILHER *___________*

Reply

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:37:09 UTC
YES. YES. YES. LILY ALLEN IS PERFECTION; I DON'T CARE WHAT ANYONE THINKS.

Reply

daybreak25 July 23 2009, 19:43:21 UTC
SHE REALLY FUCKING IS, OH MAN. I JUST WANT TO MAKE OUT WITH HER.

...ahem.

Reply

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:45:10 UTC
I AGREE WITH YOU, LOL.

Reply

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:36:06 UTC
Speaking of Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time -- and while this doesn't pertain to Bad, it still deals with Michael -- I think Thriller should have been higher than #20 FFS.

Reply

daybreak25 July 23 2009, 19:44:03 UTC
you know, i think that too. not because it was the HIGHEST SELLING ALBUM OF ALL TIME, but because it's simply brilliant. there were a lot of albums on that list that had no business being there, let me tell you.

Reply

flowerings July 23 2009, 19:48:22 UTC
Seriously, I looked at the list a couple weeks ago. I was like ... "Oh." It was very underwhelming, but it's the Rolling Stone. They're -- or rather, were; now they are putting the JONAS BROTHERS on their covers, damn -- biased towards rock music. Even though Michael experimented with all genres, he's marketed as a Pop artist ... well, after the success of Thriller, that is.

Reply

daybreak25 July 23 2009, 19:54:56 UTC
i mean, their name alone plays some reference to a rock song/group. i can't say they don't like the rock. but i figure labeling michael as purely pop was their way of having some way to market him when talking about him--it was true that he did just about everything an artist could do, but they really just need something to identify him with. oh rolling stone, way to not win.

Reply

ritergrl_xx July 23 2009, 21:37:55 UTC
Oh Rolling Stone are such failures. I've nothing against bias towards rock music, but how can you be biased towards it and have The Jonas Brothers on the cover! Actually, how can you have the Jonas Brothers on the cover of a music magazine...

Reply

daybreak25 July 24 2009, 15:12:43 UTC
hahahaha, that's what i'm saying! i don't know if i'm ready to say that the rolling stone is taking a fall, though--i'll save that for when they put miley cyrus on the cover :D

Reply

ritergrl_xx July 24 2009, 21:47:52 UTC
Miley on Rolling Stone
D:

Reply

minimalismo July 23 2009, 19:43:14 UTC
YES!!!!!!!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up