Calif. Supreme Court Strikes Down Gay Marriage Ban
Calif. Supreme Court Strikes Down Gay Marriage Ban
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff
Posted: May 15, 2008 - 1:10 pm ET,
Updated 1:23 pm ET, 1:38 pm ET, 1:45 pm ET,
2:08 pm ET, 2:25 pm ET
(San Francisco, California) The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Prop 22, the voter approved initiative used to block same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.
The court also said that California's domestic partnership law is not a good enough substitute for marriage.
Reaction To Thursday's Ruling
The 4-3 ruling. written by Chief Justice Ron George paves the way for gay and lesbian couples to marry once the ruling is officially published by the court
- in about 30 days.
Once that is done same-sex couples in California will be able to obtain civil marriage licenses.
"
In contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another
person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual's
sexual orientation - like a person's race or gender - does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights," George wrote
for the majority on the mostly Republican appointed court.
The ruling said that churches and other religious institutions will not have to recognize or perform ceremonies for these civil marriages.
The ruling does not extend to federal rights and benefits extended to married couples.
Large crowds began gathering outside the court early Thursday morning.
A wild cheer went up as the ruling was announced, drowning out gasps from opponents of same-sex marriage who also gathered in front of the court.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) said that he accepts the ruling of the court.
"Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling," a statement
from the governor said.
"Today the California Supreme Court took a giant leap to ensure that everybody - not just in the state of California, but throughout the country - will
have equal treatment under the law," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who argued the case for San Francisco.
"As of today, the right to marry is now guaranteed to anyone," said Kate Kendell, executive director of National Center for Lesbian Rights.
The case dates back to 2004 when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Some 8,000 couples exchanged vows
before the state Supreme Court ruled Newsom had acted illegally.
The court nullified the marriages but said its ruling dealt only with Newsom's actions. The justices said at the time the question of whether barring same-sex
couples from marrying violated the state's equal protection clause of its constitution was a separate matter.
Legal challenges on the constitutional question were begun almost immediately. Three separate suits ultimately were wrapped together into a single case.
In March 2005 a Superior Court judge in San Francisco ruled that the law denying same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer said
in a written ruling.
In striking down the state ban on same-sex marriage Kramer wrote that the state's historical definition of marriage, by itself, cannot justify the denial
of equal protection for gays and lesbians.
Kramer stayed his ruling while the state appealed.
In October, 2006, the California Court of Appeal in a split decision overturned Kramer's ruling and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
The dissenting opinion to Thursday's ruling was penned by Justice Marvin Baxter.
While he agreed with many arguments of the majority he said that any changes to the state marriage law should be decided by voters.
Thursday's ruling sets the stage for a battle over a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage that is likely to appear on the November ballot.
A coalition of conservative groups, under the banner 'Protect Marriage' , have submitted more than required 694,354 signatures to qualify. The signatures
are being verified.
Last month, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said that if an initiative to ban gay marriage qualifies for the November ballot, he's prepared to fight it.
He made the commitment at a convention of Log Cabin Republicans, the nation's largest gay Republican group.
Schwarzenegger has previously vetoed bills that would have legalized gay marriage. Both times Schwarzenegger said that the courts or the people through
a plebiscite should decide the issue.
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff
Posted: May 15, 2008 - 1:10 pm ET,
Updated 1:23 pm ET, 1:38 pm ET, 1:45 pm ET,
2:08 pm ET, 2:25 pm ET
(San Francisco, California) The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Prop 22, the voter approved initiative used to block same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.
The court also said that California's domestic partnership law is not a good enough substitute for marriage.
Reaction To Thursday's Ruling
The 4-3 ruling. written by Chief Justice Ron George paves the way for gay and lesbian couples to marry once the ruling is officially published by the court
- in about 30 days.
Once that is done same-sex couples in California will be able to obtain civil marriage licenses.
"
In contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another
person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual's
sexual orientation - like a person's race or gender - does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights," George wrote
for the majority on the mostly Republican appointed court.
The ruling said that churches and other religious institutions will not have to recognize or perform ceremonies for these civil marriages.
The ruling does not extend to federal rights and benefits extended to married couples.
Large crowds began gathering outside the court early Thursday morning.
A wild cheer went up as the ruling was announced, drowning out gasps from opponents of same-sex marriage who also gathered in front of the court.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) said that he accepts the ruling of the court.
"Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling," a statement
from the governor said.
"Today the California Supreme Court took a giant leap to ensure that everybody - not just in the state of California, but throughout the country - will
have equal treatment under the law," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who argued the case for San Francisco.
"As of today, the right to marry is now guaranteed to anyone," said Kate Kendell, executive director of National Center for Lesbian Rights.
The case dates back to 2004 when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Some 8,000 couples exchanged vows
before the state Supreme Court ruled Newsom had acted illegally.
The court nullified the marriages but said its ruling dealt only with Newsom's actions. The justices said at the time the question of whether barring same-sex
couples from marrying violated the state's equal protection clause of its constitution was a separate matter.
Legal challenges on the constitutional question were begun almost immediately. Three separate suits ultimately were wrapped together into a single case.
In March 2005 a Superior Court judge in San Francisco ruled that the law denying same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer said
in a written ruling.
In striking down the state ban on same-sex marriage Kramer wrote that the state's historical definition of marriage, by itself, cannot justify the denial
of equal protection for gays and lesbians.
Kramer stayed his ruling while the state appealed.
In October, 2006, the California Court of Appeal in a split decision overturned Kramer's ruling and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
The dissenting opinion to Thursday's ruling was penned by Justice Marvin Baxter.
While he agreed with many arguments of the majority he said that any changes to the state marriage law should be decided by voters.
Thursday's ruling sets the stage for a battle over a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage that is likely to appear on the November ballot.
A coalition of conservative groups, under the banner 'Protect Marriage' , have submitted more than required 694,354 signatures to qualify. The signatures
are being verified.
Last month, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said that if an initiative to ban gay marriage qualifies for the November ballot, he's prepared to fight it.
He made the commitment at a convention of Log Cabin Republicans, the nation's largest gay Republican group.
Schwarzenegger has previously vetoed bills that would have legalized gay marriage. Both times Schwarzenegger said that the courts or the people through
a plebiscite should decide the issue.