*For the purpose of this discussion, someone who enjoys any kind of relationship, het, slash, OT3, OT4, whatever, is a shipper, since shipping comes from (relation)shipping, a non-gender-defined term
Also, for this discussion, we'll ignore my reasons/motivation for slashing vs het shippingSo, I was thinking earlier about how people define shipping
(
Read more... )
Comments 59
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I was actually trying to figure it my definition of an OTP, because as much as I hardcore ship Dean/Cas, Sam and Dean are canon SOULMATES. Does that top an epic romance? Can I call Sam/Dean, in whatever form, a comin OTP because they will be together forever, and Dean/Cas is just a personal one? Idk.
Reply
Exactly! I was thinking of maybe how "canon" I see a pairing being how I ship them, and yet, I consider Sam/Dean and Dean/Cas on similar footing when it comes to canon(i.e. neither is ever going to be out-and-out canon, and yet Sam and Dean ARE soulmates, and Dean and Cas DO have a profound bond and buckets of subtext).
See! Now I've confused everyone else too. Score?
Reply
Reply
It seems like I only produce anything of any quality late at night when I literally cannot think *facepalm*
Reply
I'm pretty fic-monogamous in SPN, too (lol?), maybe because I got into it soooo late and there's so much D/C to read that I haven't felt the need to seek out pairings I really don't ship. But with baseball fandom, I'll kinda read every fic there is, even about players I really don't like. Maybe because it's so small (and there's one really good author whose favorite players and kinks are... let's just say not mine, but I've read all her stuff anyway and I really appreciated it).
Reply
See, for SPN, I will read almost anything that comes across my browser. Seriously. I read 85-90% of the non-RPF fics that are linked every day in the spnnewsletter. I've read more fic in this fandom than any other, ever. I've read shitty stuff for my favorite pairings and masterpieces for things I'd never considered before. I'm not sure how much that effects why I ship who/what I do and to what degree.
Reply
Ooh thanks for the heads-up on spnnewsletter. I never know where to start looking, so it's been kinda hard to find places for general fic (and I don't mean necessarily gen!fic by that). There is just SO MUCH of EVERYTHING though, haha.
Reply
Reply
I actually haven't been reading much fic at all lately. :O I might have overdone it... :x
Reply
I didn't mention RPF, because tbh, I don't ship any to a great degree. I'll read any J2 or permutations of J2M. I love everyone with everyone because they make it so easy and happy. So, yeah. Agreed there.
Well...I'm behind. I have a bunch of stuff to read when my schedule clears up lol over summer.
Reply
Reply
I do know that I tend more towards canon pairings or those with heavy subtextThis is traditionally me. I've always gone for the canon pairings, regardless of fandom. And yet, SPN. I still ship anything with canon-ish-ness, but I ship ALL THE THINGS, too ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I find myself platonically shipping a lot these days; enjoying the relationship, but not the explicitness or the romantic designs. It might have to do with the background I have in fangirling ensemble shows, but the gen I'm used to is defined by being an ensemble endeavor, where it tries to tell a story with equal character dev or contributions. I don't mind that kind of story: I enjoy it, on occasion. But I watch shows for characters and their interactions, not fancy plots. I don't read much gen in SPN, but what I have seen often tries to focus just on the plot, which is of no interest to me, or is pre-series, another thing I'm primarily uninterested in. There isn't too much that focuses JUST on the relationships between characters without getting romantic. The kind of gen that does, like the awesome shangrilada's fic, is what I tend to classify as platonic shipping. It's supporting, exploring, ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment