Finally, the post so many of you have been nagging me about asking for: Pre-series Daniel!
Backstory is a crucial part of understanding and writing a character. When you consider some of the more iconic fictional characters, nearly all of them reference pivotal moments in the hero's childhood or past to help us understand the driving force behind
(
Read more... )
Comments 138
This has been hinted at but never explicitly stated. it took me by susprise when I first saw it.
S6's Full Circle. Teal'c and that kid are talking and it is made to sound that the kid saw Daniel as a god. Teal'c wasn't too happy about it.
*off to read the rest*
Reply
Reply
Reply
But that was fully and forcibly debunked, by both Daniel and Sha'uri.
I do agree with you, though, that the people of Abydos might warp their reverence for Daniel into something more. Doesn't make the press release any more accurate, though! :)
Reply
Demons, S3. he could speak/read Old English.
Reply
Speaking from my own experience, it is ever so much easier to read a foreign language than to speak it. I'm trying to remember if he translated aloud or actually read the words aloud, then translated them. In either case... Hm. Does Old English qualify as a language? I already discounted Latin because is he didn't know that "loci" meant "location" in The Fifth Race, he probably went straight to studying Ancient. :)
Reply
Reply
Except, I can't believe Daniel wouldn't have encountered Latin - I mean, first off - linguistics, and second off - he speaks other romance languages. And once he connected that it was latin (and he did ID it) he figured it out pretty quickly.
Maybe just something he studied so long ago and isn't his specialty (he isn't going to find it spoken and he focuses on other aspects of ancient history and the Ancient writing doesn't look like latin) so it took him longer to catch on?
Reply
You're right - they really don't give us much, do they?
"brainy" and "scientist" are legitimate labels for Daniel, but "soft" and "clumsy," despite fanon's frequent suggestions to the contrary, are not.
Is *this* where that comes from? I keep seeing fanfics refer to Daniel as clumsy (dropping things, tripping over things) and I always scratch my head because I never notice him being especially clumsy onscreen.
The only behavior that Daniel certifies for us as entirely in character for them is that his parents used to call him Danny when he was little.
I realize, as you're saying, the gamekeeper was creating their actions - but he was also using the information in Daniel's brain to do so, so I think we should be able to assume that how his parent's behaved is somewhat on course with how Daniel remembers them. I thought it was interesting how quickly resentful Daniel was at his father - "he called me Danny, like I'm still a kid" - I could just be reading something into it though.
However, ( ... )
Reply
Thank you! It annoys me to know end that it's thought of that Daniel and his parents were wolrd travelers. Doesn't work like that!
I get hyper about this subject, can you tell?
Reply
I could believe they were world travelers - there certainly exist families who travel a lot and take young children along and I could believe Daniel's parents doing that to expose him to new places/cultures (and to keep doing what they like) but spending most of his time at digs? Doesn't sit right.
Reply
Even if Daniel's parents did travel a lot, it wouldn't be for extended periods of time. It just doesn't tend to work that way. I mean, there's a chance that it could, but for most anthroplogists and archaeologists I've know, even ones that are married to each other, they don't drag their kid everywhere. And many times the parents would switch off. Okay, you do your stuff at this time and I'll stay with the kid and I do my stuff during that time and you stay with the kid. That sort of thing.
But nothing states that I'm right here. it's just more likely than not.
It's nice to know I have people that agree with me, at leats in part ;)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Oooh, good point. I didn't go through American colleges and a lot of the finer details are a bit lost to me.
Reply
Some universities allow for a double PhD. it's rare, but it can be done. Espeically if the fields are linked. And in the US, anthropology and archaeology are often under the same department. Linguitics can or may not be a related field. It depends on what kind of linguitics. But I've know people that do the anthropology/linguistics. And there is a such thing as linguistic anthropology. I've studied under some people like that. (Oh man so brilliant.)
For Daniel to have three PhDs? That's pushing it. It's likely that he did a dual PhD somewhere and another elsewhere.
And for him to have this all done by around 30? Man, you know he didn't do much else but get lost in studies. No wonder Sarah got pissed. And that relationships seems to have happened after he had nailed at least one of his degrees.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I do hope I haven't come across as overly judgmental, although I probably got a little snippy about the poor wee abused orphan fanon thing. Cliches exist because they're common, after all; and a good author can take the most common of cliches and make it real and fresh and interesting.
Like you, there are many parts of fanon I enjoy. I do think Daniel loves Egypt and speaks Arabic as fluently as a native. and I do agree that it's fun, sometimes, to be part of that collective whole.
But I want people to know that they're following fanon and not canon. If they're aware of that, and they want to use it anyway? That's fine by me. :)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment