Knocking Two Heads Together

[semper_augustus]

We live in a time when radical secularists will stop at nothing to advance their agenda. It is one thing to be indifferent toward religion, quite another to unleash an anti-religion crusade. This is exactly what the new atheism is all about-a dogmatic plundering of religion, especially Christianity, done in the name of tolerance. What makes Philip

Comments

[eumelosdrizzle]

To quote JFK...

"We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."

You've given this a lot of thought, and I like it.

Perhaps Science/Technology/Liberty take on a the qualities of religion for the majority of people in the "Developed World". I think a larger problem that stems from the belief that technology solves all problems is that it is not only incorrect, but also overlooks the fact that the vast majority of the world are not seeing any benefits from the technological marvels you describe. In fact, most people are seeing things get worse while the minority live like Kings.

Science and Technology, and by extension the fanatical belief in its ability to reap untold benefits to a the chosen few, could definitely be seen as the "new religion".

[semper_augustus]

And yet, betraying its Christian origins, the faith in Technology and Liberty includes a belief that the benefits of Technology and Liberty should be open to all. We just can't yet do it. Much as all Religions have heretofore been unable to create its version of the Golden Age. It would be unfair to criticize it simply for that.

The question a Techno-Libertarian* would ask is, "Are we better at it than earlier religions?"

* I am not for a moment suggesting that this should be its name. It's an ugly name, but I needed something to call it.

[eumelosdrizzle]

Agreed. And like its counterpart in more conventional religion, there are definitely people who not only fervently hold that their belief has universal application, but also take real steps toward realizing that goal. So, I guess the criticism should properly be addressed at those who bask in their currently luxury at the expense of the majority comforted in their belief that someday all will reap the benefits bestowed by their techno-libertarian idols.

I really liked your post, its an essay in the truest spirit of the word - thought provoking and inviting furhter discussion and consideration of its thesis.

[semper_augustus]

It should also be addressed to those who believe that strict adherence to their One True Religion, no matter the cost, as a solution for all the world's problems. We are living in our own Age of Miracles, but the Age of Arrogance follows. Compare Tertullian to Ambrose.

[semper_augustus]

Or Marcus Aurelius to Julian. Constantine to Theodosius.

And thank you. It is always more satisfying to make someone honestly ask a question than to get him to honestly believe my answer.