A final movie rant: Don't strangle it

Dec 20, 2009 20:21

Here is a trend in movies that I hate I feel like talking about to cap off the weekend: I hate when movies strangle themselves.

"Strangling" is when a movie introduces elements that it forcibly resolves to its detriment.  Example: every thing that was introduced in, oh I don't know, Avatar, had to find its way back into the movie later in some way ( Read more... )

movies

Leave a comment

Comments 10

thesaucemonster December 21 2009, 03:27:25 UTC
Having read the source material before watching Watchmen, I know how Rorshach's mask works. Not very important to include in the film, but it's source makes adds another fantastic history and nuance to the character.

Reply

momoyeahmomo December 21 2009, 04:51:31 UTC
I was just about to make the same comment!

Reply

scottwoods December 21 2009, 20:38:02 UTC
Come on, guys: you know that I know it's explained in the book.
We're talking about taking movies at face value here.

Reply


johnnylexicon December 21 2009, 07:00:36 UTC
Dark City? Really? Because when you introduced me to the concept of "strangling" early in this post, Dark City was the first example I could think of. Maybe they don't explain everything until the last act, but boy, do they ever overexplain it when they need to underexplain it.

I suppose, when done well, "strangling" is just a form of "Chekhov's gun." I think the key is that if you're going to use all the parts of the buffalo, don't introduce that many parts. It's elegant when it's thought-out and simple. But yeah, it turns into nonsense pretty easily. That whole "the crucifix pendant from Act 1 stops a bullet in Act 5, which has significance" stuff is insufferable.

Reply


theryk December 21 2009, 18:42:32 UTC
"- How Rorshach's mask works in Watchmen "

In the book this is explained.

Reply

scottwoods December 21 2009, 20:37:43 UTC
Come on, guys: you know that I know it's explained in the book.
We're talking about taking movies at face value here.

Reply

theryk December 21 2009, 21:45:17 UTC
Heh heh... "face" value.

Reply


irishcoyote December 22 2009, 14:37:01 UTC
Dude, you should sue Cameron for the distress that caused you to spew several hundred words that should have gone to haikus.

Reply

scottwoods December 22 2009, 16:34:27 UTC
LOL. SO right.

Reply


wonderdave December 22 2009, 18:05:54 UTC
I know it's not a Movie but it's something I feel did exactly what you're talking about. When Marvel comics decided to give a back story of Wolverine's existence and childhood totally unnecessary.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up