Bill Campana's feature tonight was, no joke, mind-blowing.
Forget that he bought me genuine Mexican food yesterday or that he told me he liked my feature last night. Forget all that. I can certainly post in my journal without kissing anyone's hind parts. I could have bypassed his whole feature here if I wanted to. I don't want to. It was
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
I enjoyed Chesko, Tom, Niel, and Alvin. But Bill's set sounded like more fun from what I read in your entry. Oh Well, maybe next time. :-)
Plus, the dinner with Holli, Therese and Klute sounded BOMB. I'll have to email Klute to get the info on the spot.
Reply
Reply
I wonder if the slam format and that kind of time-obsessed memorization makes so many poets have that robotic, over-rehearsed quality. In the last couple of weeks, I had a really nasty feeling of "being processed" when every gesture, every inflection, was exactly the same thing I'd seen six months or so before. Not a good feeling at all.
It always needs to be about the poetry (and who you're with - the audience).
Sounds like you had an awesome trip, friend.
Reply
My features tend to vary greatly because I'm either always switching poems in and out or trying to stay interesting to whoever is there. I never just go, "Well, here are my five high-scoring Slam poems" and walk off the stage.
Reply
OTOH, I was at Tony's "old-school" impromptu reading (when his bassist got kicked out of the bar by an overzealous bartender) and even these really old poems were fresh to me. Tony may have done them "a lot" back in the old day, but it didn't feel like he was doing something he'd done a hundred times.
It's strange how that works sometimes.
I need to see you more often, it's always a fun experience. Funny, I see you don't do a poem in a set (like "Flavour of Love") and I think "hey, I like that one" - like I'm there and missed it or something. Yes, I am a dork.
Reply
Leave a comment