Okay - at long last saw Tristan + Isolde, which has the tag line of "Before Romeo and Juliet there was Tristan and Isolde." The rant that follows maybe one person will get.
Well, someone was way too infatuated with dear old R&J to like...research the social and political contexts of Medieval Ireland and Britain. So, in summation it was
(
Read more... )
*boggles* seriously?
But which Romeo and Juliet do you recommend?
Reply
Uh, as to R&J's, if you want the real flavor of it (as in Juliet is her proper 14 years old, etc), go for the Franco Zeffirelli version. However, I actually really like Baz Lurhmann's Romeo + Juliet, because I think its pretty damned creative in its adaptation. Also Mercutio is a tranny, which for some reason really works for me.
Reply
I loved Baz Lurhmann's adaption as well, but I tend to fond about modern readpations done well :) have you ever seen R&J performed live? I saw it a couple years ago and it interesting how versions differ (this happened after some ethnic discontent in Australia so had modern influences).
Reply
I love how Shakespeare is so adaptable. I'm not sure I liked Ethan Hawke's Hamlet (To Be or Not to Be in a Blockbuster Video action section....? Cute, but no dice.). I'm not actually sure if I've ever seen R&J live - I see weird ones like Measure for Measure live. ~_^
Reply
Last year I saw King Lear live and was extremely ill from a horrid cold. I nearly fell asleep and my head was going up and down as I nearly dozed off... Comedy of Errors and the Merchant of Venice was hilarious live. That kind of humour can pass through centuries and still bring a smile. That about rounds off what I've seen of Shakespeare performed :)
Reply
Leave a comment