Было. Но сейчас ситуация такова, что работодатель не рискует. Назовите мне, кто реально сел в тюрьму - или хотя бы заплатил штраф, сравнимый с доходом от эксплуатации нелегалов?
Насколько я могу судить, сажают в основном за money laundering, и мелких сошек. Штрафы, похоже, символические:
* Aquarius Yacht Services - $13,744 fine * Balboa Ambulance Incorporated - $50,000 fine * El Sol Meat Market - $24,050 fine * Harmony Egg Ranch - $9,000 fine * International Consolidated Cargo - $7,480 fine * Mexicali Chicken and Salad - $21,500 fine * Old Town Buffet - $15,000 fine * Rocha Trucking & Parking Inc. - $8,000 fine * Stanford Sign and Awning Inc. - $9,600 fine * TDG Aerospace - $15,427.50 fine
The $173,800 in civil fines lodged against area San Diego-area companies in fiscal year 2012 represents an 18 percent increase over fiscal year 2011, when HSI imposed $146,577 in civil fines locally against 11 employers.
Бывал я в Сан-Диего и масштаб себе представляю. Полторы сотни тысяч в год штрафов на 11 работодателей Сан-Диего - это cost of doing business. Дешевле заплатить и нанять нового иммигранта взамен депортированного.
Признаться, забыл. Но интересно, что именно это дело доказывает! Вот из википедии:
Rubashkin was convicted in November 2009 on 86 charges of financial fraud, including bank fraud, mail and wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors had claimed the company intentionally defrauded St. Louis based First Bank on a revolving $35 million loan by faking invoices from meat dealers, inflating the value of the company.[21]
On November 23, 2009, Rubashkin's second trial on 72 immigration charges was canceled following the government's request to dismiss without prejudice. In its motion to dismiss, the U.S. Attorneys Office said any conviction on the immigration charges would have no impact upon his sentence, writing, "dismissal will avoid an extended and expensive trial, conserve limited resources, and lessen the inconvenience to witnesses."[22] Federal Judge Linda R. Reade dismissed the immigration charges without prejudice.То есть именно то, что я и подозревал: в отличие от других обвинений, найм нелегалов преследовать по уголовке
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Насколько я могу судить, сажают в основном за money laundering, и мелких сошек. Штрафы, похоже, символические:
* Aquarius Yacht Services - $13,744 fine
* Balboa Ambulance Incorporated - $50,000 fine
* El Sol Meat Market - $24,050 fine
* Harmony Egg Ranch - $9,000 fine
* International Consolidated Cargo - $7,480 fine
* Mexicali Chicken and Salad - $21,500 fine
* Old Town Buffet - $15,000 fine
* Rocha Trucking & Parking Inc. - $8,000 fine
* Stanford Sign and Awning Inc. - $9,600 fine
* TDG Aerospace - $15,427.50 fine
The $173,800 in civil fines lodged against area San Diego-area companies in fiscal year 2012 represents an 18 percent increase over fiscal year 2011, when HSI imposed $146,577 in civil fines locally against 11 employers.
Бывал я в Сан-Диего и масштаб себе представляю. Полторы сотни тысяч в год штрафов на 11 работодателей Сан-Диего - это cost of doing business. Дешевле заплатить и нанять нового иммигранта взамен депортированного.
Reply
Reply
Rubashkin was convicted in November 2009 on 86 charges of financial fraud, including bank fraud, mail and wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors had claimed the company intentionally defrauded St. Louis based First Bank on a revolving $35 million loan by faking invoices from meat dealers, inflating the value of the company.[21]
On November 23, 2009, Rubashkin's second trial on 72 immigration charges was canceled following the government's request to dismiss without prejudice. In its motion to dismiss, the U.S. Attorneys Office said any conviction on the immigration charges would have no impact upon his sentence, writing, "dismissal will avoid an extended and expensive trial, conserve limited resources, and lessen the inconvenience to witnesses."[22] Federal Judge Linda R. Reade dismissed the immigration charges without prejudice.То есть именно то, что я и подозревал: в отличие от других обвинений, найм нелегалов преследовать по уголовке ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment