The Economist decides to put out it's own "Green" issue
OK. Usually I stick with hemp stories. I like hemp. And in life you gotta choose you battles and Eco includes hemp, but that's pretty much where I draw the line. I mean the War on Drugs has been devastation to the ecosphere since Nixon sprayed paraquat in California's Emerald Triangle and what they're doing in Columbia... not good for the planet. But that isn't my battle. So I stick to hemp. Which I like (Am I repeating myself? Where's my short term memory?). And I wasn't always a fan of the Economist. Sure, it's well written but back in the 90's they were writing how we needn't worry about Global Warming because "only 3% of the US Economy is based on weather". Back then I wanted to know what they were smoking... but now I really gotta wonder. Especially with an article today on Medical Marijuana that says
Forward motion make you sway like the ocean. The herb is more than just a powerful potion. What's the commotion? Yo I'm not joking around... People learning about, what they're smoking? My oven is on high, when I roast the quail. Tell Bill Clinton to go and inhale. Really. Is that sensible journalism?