I came across this definition years ago in a piece of Planescape fiction (which I'd love to find again at some point). They (and I) define evil as the willful disregard of the wants and needs of other beings. The nice thing about this is by adding the willful clause, it removes selfishness/self-centeredness and moves them from being considered evil to just being asshats.
I would add, that by "beings" I mean sentient beings (aka us humans). As Animal Planet has shown, the "need" of a predator to eat vs a prey animal's "need" to not be eaten does not equate to an evil act.
I point again to the movie, "The Ghost and the Darkness" in which a pair of lions were hunting and killing humans, not just for food, but also for sport.
Does this qualify as "evil"? I'm not sure. But I think it's a fascinating perspective on how the concept of evil may have developed.
enter in the "willful disregard". So yes, Jack Bauer is "evil" because he does evil things for "the sake of the greater good". It is societie's perogative to punish him for his evil, or to excuse it because his evil actions provided more positive "for the greater good".
The nice thing about this is by adding the willful clause, it removes selfishness/self-centeredness and moves them from being considered evil to just being asshats.
Reply
Reply
Does this qualify as "evil"? I'm not sure. But I think it's a fascinating perspective on how the concept of evil may have developed.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
asshattishness is one thing, mean-evil-rude-abusive-manipulative is another thing entirely.
Reply
Leave a comment