(Untitled)

Sep 15, 2011 08:00

The unnamed agency in our previous post has chosen to come forward to present their perception of our exchange. We confirm that it was the agency we referred to. We stand by every word we wrote in our original article ( Read more... )

gay, ya, genreville

Leave a comment

Comments 116

la_marquise_de_ September 15 2011, 15:12:20 UTC
I have the feeling that public and private stances by gatekeepers are often very different, and that they are wary of revelations about the private ones.

Reply


fpb September 15 2011, 15:26:17 UTC

azdak September 15 2011, 16:20:23 UTC
The agency does not seem to me to be acting in good faith.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

sartorias September 15 2011, 16:46:13 UTC
sigh. There's no use whatever into speculating about motivations.

We did take a month to think this over, and we wrote several drafts. We really, really wanted to keep names out of it, because it was clear that there was a much larger problem.

Reply

dancinghorse September 15 2011, 17:04:02 UTC
God bless Malinda Lo, who did the numbers and the charts--because you can whip those out to back up your article.

The agency was extremely unprofessional in its response. That will not serve them well in the long run.

The industry has a huge problem with sexual orientation and gender bias. They're being called on it, and they don't like it one little bit.

Reply

rachelmanija September 15 2011, 17:08:17 UTC
I was enormously impressed with Malinda's work.

Reply


asakiyume September 15 2011, 17:04:28 UTC
You guys acted in good faith on an issue that was important to you. And, from the responses to the Genreville post, it seems to have been something other people have experienced and something that deserves talking about.

It's very easy for the agency to take the route of saying, "Oh, well, their book had other problems." If that's their perception of things, fine. But the conversation is still worth having. Because, while on a personal level, of course you guys want the book published (and so do we!), that wasn't the reason you acted.

I hope, and believe, that your taking the brave step can still have a positive effect, if editors feel that there's a large readership out there. Maybe agents will take more risks, knowing editors are more open, and there'll end up being more books published that represent the true variety of young people's experiences and personhood.

Reply

sartorias September 15 2011, 17:11:33 UTC
Exactly. Exactly.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up