From notes to novel

Jan 29, 2009 08:32

All this month Justine Larbalestier has been answering questions about the process of writing from her readers. It's so interesting reading about others' processes: sometimes it's a relief when someone has as one-legged-rooster-riding-a-rocking-chair messy an approach as I have; other times it's fascinating when someone has a process that ( Read more... )

writing: process, links, story

Leave a comment

klwilliams January 29 2009, 18:07:25 UTC
I'm a software engineer by training, and I write long things the same way I write software. I know what it's supposed to do, and I know where it begins and where it ends, and what the major points along the way should be. Then I start, and figure out the details as I go along. The way my mind works, rough spots and things that don't fit usually stick out in my mind and bug me until I do something about them. With longer works, I'm more likely to miss some of these, but I also get bugs in my software. That's why I rely on first readers and QA. :-)

Reply

sartorias January 29 2009, 18:11:49 UTC
Sounds like your hindbrain is pretty reliable for doing groundwork!

Reply

klwilliams January 29 2009, 18:28:43 UTC
It really is. However, I think the result of that is that I can get stuck in one direction and not find a way out of it for a while.

Reply

heleninwales January 30 2009, 14:01:21 UTC
That's very much my approach. Before I'll even start writinga novel, I need a Beginning, and End and a few key points long the way.

I do find diagrammatic methods of planning useful though as a way of filling out the gaps between the known points.

Reply

arkessian January 30 2009, 17:07:55 UTC
Me too (physicist/software engineer and writing technique)! I almost always have a beginning and an end, and grope my way from B to E enjoying the discoveries as I go.

Although the result has been that I'm called on using "whopping great coincidences" that aren't any such thing from my perspective. Note to self: must do better... Or write the sequel(s) that prove the lack of coincidences.

Reply

sartorias January 30 2009, 17:15:01 UTC
Or write the transitional scenes that prove that they are not coincidences?

Reply

arkessian January 30 2009, 17:24:52 UTC
The book was publish nearly twenty year ago... but I'm hoping to put it up on the web this year and maybe fix the apparent coincidences...

Reply

sartorias January 30 2009, 17:30:07 UTC
A new edition! Why not?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up