Series--thrill or threat?

Nov 13, 2008 14:16

Over at the Tor.com site, Jane Lindskold talks about series and stand-alones. The nice thing is, she doesn't sneer. I've taken to avoiding the sneer posts. Most of the time they just slang fat fantasy altogether (lumping it all together) or point to one or two examples that the poster didn't like, and again assuming they are All The Same. Life's ( Read more... )

series, links, reading

Leave a comment

sartorias November 14 2008, 00:53:46 UTC
I think I know where you're coming from. My own perception of epic goes back to reading the Eldar Eddas and Beowulf and so on. Those tales did have characterization, but in such tiny bits, buried under obscure cultural clues and custom. Then along came Dunsany and the quest tales and many called those epic, which kind of blurred the definition for me.

I tend to avoid the term now, because I don't quite trust it. By some definitions, Gormenghast is epic--and in others' view, it's anti-epic. Eddison is sometimes seen as epic, others say no. Ditto about Tolkien. That's a quest tale, and it draws on bits of the northern epics, but to me, it has a strong focus on character, like you mention. So I think of those as broad or big canvas fantasy, though that's an unsatisfactory term, too. But these big stories get divided up into volumes, and sometimes they have totally unsatisfactory endings, a la Two Towers because of the exigencies of publishing.

Maybe it's better if they all come out at once? I remember talking to people who were immensely frustrated waiting between volume two and three of LOTR.

I dunno, speculation only.

Reply

danceswithwaves November 14 2008, 02:30:40 UTC
I think... I think the time between books matters more for roman fleuve stories than for serialization stories. Because you're left hanging more. So I guess then it would be better if they all came out at once.

But if you asked me if I'd rather wait for a new series four years and have the full series or get a new book every year and have to wait, I think it would depend on if I knew the author or not. If I know the author I'd probably say have a book every year, but if I didn't know the author I'd probably say I'd wait.

Reply

sartorias November 14 2008, 02:51:48 UTC
*nod*

I don't know what I'd say. I've loved discovering series once they all came out, but if I get into a series that's in the middle of appearing, I have NO self control about waiting until the last volume is out!

Reply

tooticky November 15 2008, 04:46:39 UTC
Reading this, it's just occurred to me that this is the opposite side of the fence from the writer's dead-line from hell that we were discussing previously. Readers want their fixes. They can wait a year, but I think if they crave the story, waiting any longer makes people grumpy and less interested.
This must be where the pressure for hard, sharp dead-lines with a possibly successful series must come from.

Reply

marycatelli November 15 2008, 03:02:02 UTC
I am very glad that I got all three of Tolkien's out of the library at once.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up