Originally published at
Sarah Rees Brennan. You can comment here or
there.
It made me so sad to see, in an article about Jane Austen, that even though Jane Austen remains super popular there has been a decline in respect for her as a serious artist. Because it’s ‘chick lit’… as if any genre is Automatically Bad. And as if anything a woman created
(
Read more... )
Comments 93
Reply
Reply
Reply
When people check back on my website to see why they definitely should not give me awards, I may be sorry. ;)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Off the top of my head, I can think of three writers we've mentioned multiple times: Akela Cooper, Jane Espenson, Charles Ardai. Generally with praise, because we try to call people out by name only when there's stuff we like, and only call out the stuff itself we don't like. So, we try not to tell anyone specific "OMG SHUT UP" But now I'm wondering what our numbers are on women and men whose writing we've discussed. Hurm.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This is perfect. So many times when bringing up this phenomenon, the only response is "How could you accuse me of being sexist?! Just cause I don't like something!"
But it exactly that we have to examine why we dislike certain things, especially if our dislike goes along with a societal pattern. There's nothing wrong with having to examine, or examining and coming to the conclusion that we still don't like the work, but it's just the resistance from so many people when they're told they should do so that is strange.
Reply
Reply
Your observation parallels another that comes to mind, and I hope I won't give offense by taking the liberty of paraphrasing you:
But lots of people want to be very clear that Saint Mary Magdalene may have been Jesus’s friend, but she wasn’t one of the Apostles. She didn’t attend meetings! Okay maybe one but it didn’t count! They were all, all dudes. (Okay. Maybe so. But chill yourselves, why is this so hotly contested? … Oh wait I know why.)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment