(no subject)

Oct 18, 2006 17:42

i think people are innately good.
on the whole, at your core, i know you are good.

i believe that every being stems from goodness without corruption and that it must therefore be uncontrollable factors within a person's perception and interpretation of individual experiences that somehow make a person "bad".
but. what if no one is really bad. what if it is just a soul hardened and immune to the sympathies of everyday life? what if they are just not wholly good? should a rose without leaves or stem be given, it is still a rose is it not? just as you would still call a rose with no stem, a rose, you would yet still call a person with differences in character traits a person. and if people are all good. they, too, are good.

i dislike no one.
and i feel that my misfortunes of the day should not influence my outlook on life or behavior toward others.
i will make it a point to do this.

i feel rather happy.
i feel good.
and for this, i thank God.

however, i do feel that if one is given the intelligence to find the gene for freaking people with some long-second-toe disorder, then one should definitely be able to determine an OVERNIGHT cure for acne.

the end.

p.s. pray for my grandfather.
Previous post
Up