I'm kind of checking in and out of the
news thread and a handful of people have brought up the question as to whether or not LJ made some kind of contractual deal with FB & Twitter to push users towards these other services. And now LJ is in a tight spot, legally speaking, because their customers are clearly screaming DO NOT WANT and packing up in
(
Read more... )
http://news.livejournal.com/129190.html?thread=87841446#t87841446
Reply
Reply
Sure, there's the hack that keeps the boxes from showing up as long as your journal is viewed In YOUR style; but if I view it in my style, unless I have them turned off, they're right back there again. :-(
Reply
Press releases are not contracts. They are promotions.
Reply
ETA: I'd think that if it were a contractual relationship, FB would be touting it too -- and they're not.
Point is, they've designed it the way it is for a purpose -- the issue is that it's not optional.
Reply
Edited: Yep, & Facebook doesn't give a crap. More content on their site, whatevs, howevs. Facebook is like a giant vacuum cleaner trying to suck everybody's content into it's feed.
Reply
For all we know, this could have been entirely handed down from the Russian side of the company, without much consideration to the US customer base.
Hmm. Could also explain the slow response, if they're trying to hash this out between the two sides of the company on opposite sides of the planet and a language barrier in between...
Reply
That is very likely! And LJ's communication to U.S. users has been abysmal all along.
Reply
Leave a comment