w00t!! Excellent news!

Sep 27, 2007 15:27

The U.S. Senate has passed the Matthew Shepard act ( Read more... )

homosexuality, bisexuality, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 17

snailbones September 27 2007, 19:50:59 UTC
Excellent! Sounds like a leap in the right direction.

::does the happy dance::

Reply

sara_merry99 September 27 2007, 20:18:57 UTC
::links arms and dances with::

Reply


raynedanser September 27 2007, 19:52:23 UTC
HOORAH!!!

Reply

sara_merry99 September 27 2007, 20:19:46 UTC
::bounces::

Hoorah indeed!!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

sara_merry99 September 27 2007, 20:20:07 UTC
Now we just have to hope that W doesn't muck it up!

Reply


spookycat4 September 27 2007, 20:09:29 UTC
OK, I have to confess. I'm not a fan of this. Not, because I think it's OK to bash homosexuals, because I don't. I think it's disgusting. But, I have to say, that "hate" crimes legislation of all types bothers the hell out of me. I just don't think the reason you hit someone in the face, or drag them behind a pickup, or stomp their head, should matter.

To me, if I kill someone in a robbery, and someone else kills someone in a gay bashing, we're both despicable, and the dead person is just as dead. I don't think Matthew Sheppard should matter less than the teacher robbed and murdered last year in the mall 2 miles from my house, but I don't think he should matter more either.

Kim

Reply

sara_merry99 September 27 2007, 20:15:36 UTC
I believe that the impulse to enact anti-hate crimes legislation came about because in some jurisdictions hate crimes were getting pursued with less vigor than other kinds of crimes. Not all jurisdictions, by any means, but enough that allowing entirely local standards to prevail meant that some crimes based on racial, religious or other forms of hate were not getting investigated.

Sot it's not that Matthew Shepard should matter *less* than the teacher murdered near you last year--but he should matter the same *everywhere in the country*--whether conservative Wyoming or liberal Massachusetts. And that takes a federal law.

Does that make sense?

Reply

high_striker September 27 2007, 21:28:59 UTC
I think it makes sense ( ... )

Reply

sara_merry99 September 28 2007, 14:24:12 UTC
What we truly need is a justice system that automatically looks at everyone as a human being, and no more than that; not by their race, creed, or sexual orientation.

Amen, sister!! But we can't have that until society as a whole is able to look at everyone as a human being, not as part of a group...and while we're making strides, that's going to be a long time coming.

Reply


ponders_life September 27 2007, 23:04:59 UTC
Yay!!!!!

Reply

sara_merry99 September 28 2007, 14:28:37 UTC
::links arms and dances with you::

Reply


Leave a comment

Up