I am so gay

Mar 12, 2005 21:55

So a couple of weeks ago, Entertainment Weekly came out with a list of the 50 best love songs. I decided to use some of the songs on the list (plus a few that I chose) to make a love song mix ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

darth_vin March 13 2005, 09:35:58 UTC
That's almost one of the worst lists of "romantic" songs ever.

Reply

sampants March 13 2005, 14:55:22 UTC
Maybe you should write a letter to the editors of Entertainment Weekly telling them that.

Reply

sampants March 13 2005, 16:37:55 UTC
P.S. I am very open to any song suggestions, so if you know better ones, please share. I picked those because I like them. I know there are many more choices that are considered standards, but I don't like a lot of those. An example of one of the songs I hate is More Than Words by Extreme. *gags*

Reply

darth_vin March 14 2005, 16:28:37 UTC
Really? I would have figured "More Than Words" would be right up your alley, since you think John Mayer songs are romantic. They're pretty much all about the same thing.

Reply

sampants March 14 2005, 18:05:08 UTC
I think John Mayer songs are romantic, but I don't like them. I don't want romantic for romantic's sake.

And..ha ha. iTunes has that John Mayer song that you said was unromantic and only about fucking as one of the all-time top romantic songs. So there.

Reply

darth_vin March 14 2005, 19:04:41 UTC
iTunes is also created by the same people that make Macintosh computers.

So there.

Reply

sampants March 14 2005, 19:19:08 UTC
I doubt the programmers are making the song lists. It's done by EXPERTS!!!! Love song experts.

And I can't stand apple computers, but damn, Joey's iPod is the niftiest thing in the world.

Reply

darth_vin March 14 2005, 20:12:35 UTC
Yeah, I still don't get why people want those things. I mean, sure, I wanted a Walkman when I was, like, 10-years-old.

Reply

sampants March 14 2005, 21:09:07 UTC
You are silly.

Reply

darth_vin March 14 2005, 20:16:32 UTC
Do you somehow think that because somebody works for Entertainment Weekly, they know more about "romance" than other people?

Let me tell you something, journalists are stupid. And those people aren't even journalists.

Half the songs you listed have fast beats and use pentatonic scales. They create tension in your body when you're listening to them, which somebody like you who has lived a very sheltered and protected life would see as exciting. That excitment translates to eroticism to you, which you are mistaking for romance.

Reply

sampants March 14 2005, 21:08:22 UTC
I think it is odd that you separate love and sex. They aren't always mutually exclusive.

Reply

darth_vin March 14 2005, 22:53:58 UTC
Love is not defined by sex, though.

Sex and love aren't mutually exclusive in the same way that watching a movie together and love aren't mutually exclusive, or that walking down the road together and love aren't mutually exclusive.

Sex holds no monopoly on love. There are lots of things besides sex that people do with somebody they love that they wouldn't do with somebody they didn't love. And there are lots of people that have sex that don't love each other.

Reply

sampants March 15 2005, 03:51:51 UTC
My point is that an upbeat sexy song can also be linked to love. Sex does not eliminate love, which your post seemed to imply. Eroticism and romance can go together quite well.

Reply

darth_vin March 15 2005, 08:13:51 UTC
And my point is that those songs by John Mayer and Extreme are exclusively about sex, not love or romance. You are just automatically associating that a song about sex means it's about romance and love, which it is not.

Reply

sampants March 15 2005, 12:22:15 UTC
Just once it would be nice to argue with you without you making huge leaps of logic.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up